Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student’s performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student’s performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. with this statement? X0Jw
University examination, such as theory or practical, can give a correct evidence of student's level of knowledge and abilities at the university level, while continuous evaluation strike course work and project are less effective methods to measure students capabilities. I agree to this statement for a number of reasons. To begin with, continuous examination have a number of flaws. Firstly, while preparing projects and assignment students have to refer books in order to get enough knowledge. This would mean, that they are using knowledge from the texts and outside resources to generate ideas rather than their own. Secondly, this evaluation might be dependent on teachers prejudice towards students. There for, students to not get an apt review even if they prepared well. So, project work and sessional examination are least capable for assessing their abilities. However, university examination or board examination are more efficient for evaluating students intelligence. It is because, most of the university examination are held under examination control board which has standard guidelines. Hence, there is no bias of teacher's partiality towards children. All children are assessed for standard parameters. So, formal examination is good for evaluating a student rather than having continuous assessment. In conclusion, continuous evaluation itself can have certain negative effects like using knowledge from other sources and teachers partiality. Hence, I believe the projects and assignments are poor measures of students ability.
University
examination
, such as theory or practical, can give a correct evidence of student's level of
knowledge
and abilities at the
university
level, while
continuous
evaluation strike course work and
project
are less effective methods to measure
students
capabilities. I
agree
to this statement for a number of reasons. To
begin
with,
continuous
examination
have a number of flaws.
Firstly
, while preparing
projects
and assignment
students
have to
refer books in order to
get
enough
knowledge
. This would mean, that they are using
knowledge
from the texts and outside resources to generate
ideas
rather
than their
own
.
Secondly
, this evaluation might be dependent on teachers prejudice towards
students
. There for,
students
to not
get
an apt review even if they prepared well.
So
,
project
work and
sessional
examination
are least capable for assessing their abilities.
However
,
university
examination
or board
examination
are more efficient for evaluating
students
intelligence. It is
because
, most of the
university
examination
are held
under
examination
control board which has standard guidelines.
Hence
, there is no bias of teacher's partiality towards children. All children
are assessed
for standard parameters.
So
, formal
examination
is
good
for evaluating a
student
rather
than having
continuous
assessment.
In conclusion
,
continuous
evaluation itself can have certain
negative
effects like using
knowledge
from other sources and teachers partiality.
Hence
, I believe the
projects
and assignments are poor measures of
students
ability.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student’s performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. with this statement?

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
229 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts