Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that people pay more attention as well as money to historical and cultural attractions. Whilr some people think foreign tourists should pay more, I agree the view of those who believe it should be equal for foreigners and aborigines. To begin with, foreign visitors travel to other countries in order to know about their cultures, traditions as well as their histories. Some individuals believe it should be more expensive for tourists to enter these places. With introduce higher costs, government might earn extra money and also spend it for developing of attractions, such as museums, historical sites. For instance, in Uzbekistan the entry cost of Registan square, which is situated in Samarkand is higher for tourists than inhabitants and authority expend money in order to renovation of this place. However, I would argue that it should be the same for both of them because of some reasons. Firstly, foreign travellers have numerous expenditure to trip other regions, for example for visa and ticket of either train's and plane's, also the charge of food, hotel and perhaps for presents. Secondly, since foreign visitors have a contribution to tourism of country, it would be better to debase costs. The more tourists travel the nation, the more popular it will be. Furthermore, it helps to remain state's standing on the global stage in terms of popularity. To sum up, it seems to me that it would be better to introduce similar prices for both foreign guests and local residents.

It is true that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 pay more attention as well
 as money to historical and cultural attractions. Possible spelling mistake found.WhileWhirlWhir
Whilr
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdifferentunfamiliaralienexternaloverseasoffshore
foreign
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvisitorsightseertraveler
tourists
 should pay more, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 the view of those who believe it should be equal for foreigners and aborigines. To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdifferentunfamiliaralienexternaloverseasoffshore
foreign
 visitors travel to other countries in order to know about their cultures, traditions as well
 as their histories. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 individuals believe it should be more expensive for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvisitorsightseertraveler
tourists
 to enter these places. With introduce higher costs, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 might earn extra money and also
The usual prepositions that follow “spend it” are either “on” or “in”. Did you mean “spend it on”?spend it on
spend it for
 developing of attractions, such as museums, historical sites. For instance
, in Uzbekistan the entry cost of Possible spelling mistake found.RegisterResistantRegistryRegistrarRegistrant
Registan
 square, which is situated
 in Samarkand is higher for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvisitorsightseertraveler
tourists
 than inhabitants and authority expend money in order to renovation of this place. However
, I would argue that it should be the same for both of them This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 reasons. Firstly
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdifferentunfamiliaralienexternaloverseasoffshore
foreign
Possible spelling mistake. ‘travellers’ is British English.travelers
travellers
 have numerous expenditure to trip other regions, for example
 for visa and ticket of either train's and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:aircraft
plane
's, also
 the charge of food, hotel and perhaps for presents. Secondly
, since You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdifferentunfamiliaralienexternaloverseasoffshore
foreign
 visitors have a contribution to tourism of country, it would be better to debase costs. The more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvisitorsightseertraveler
tourists
 travel the nation, the more popular it will be. Furthermore
, it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assists
helps
 to remain state's standing on the global stage in terms of popularity. To sum up, it seems to me that it would be better to introduce similar prices for both You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdifferentunfamiliaralienexternaloverseasoffshore
foreign
 guests and local residents. 