Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

fine lines could not represent that the dinosaur had feather. The lecturer, nonetheless, refutes the author's explanations by offering three counterclaims.First, the passage posits that after dying, the animal's skin might have decomposed into f

fine lines could not represent that the dinosaur had feather. The lecturer, nonetheless, refutes the author's explanations by offering three counterclaims. First, the passage posits that after dying, the animal's skin might have decomposed into f BJWod
Actually, both the passage and the lecturer discuss about fossils skeleton of a dinosaur named Sinosauropteryx. Although shape of the remained fossil show that the dinosaur had feather, the critics brings three hypothesizes in the passage for dismissing the claims. the professor puts those reasons under question in order to prove that the mentioned criticisms aren't convincing. First, as the passage illustrated decomposition of dinosaur skin caused such a shape that defect people to believe dinosaurs have feather; nonetheless, the lecturer doesn’t reinforce the idea by adding the thought that fossils of other animals which are found in that area preserve so beautiful and complete that confirms us to accept the fact that dinosaur had feather. Next, the passage expresses that those extra part of dinosaurs was frail because remaining frails as a fossil as more possible; however, the professor doesn’t validate the mentioned claim by indicating the fact that the component of feather and frail demonstrate us that they were feather. Finally, the passage believes that the position of feathers couldn’t help dinosaur. they not only didn't contribute dinosaur to fly but they also couldn’t be conserved from adverse climate. Conversely, the lecturer rejects the idea by exemplifies another bird that has same feather and can fly; besides, the colorful dinosaur shows us they definitely had diverse feathers on their body.
Actually, both the
passage
and the lecturer discuss about
fossils
skeleton of a
dinosaur
named
Sinosauropteryx
. Although shape of the remained
fossil
show
that the
dinosaur
had
feather
, the critics brings three hypothesizes in the
passage
for dismissing the claims.
the
professor puts those reasons under question in order to prove that the mentioned criticisms aren't convincing.

First
, as the
passage
illustrated decomposition of
dinosaur
skin caused such a shape that defect
people
to believe dinosaurs have
feather
; nonetheless, the lecturer doesn’t reinforce the
idea
by adding the
thought
that
fossils
of other animals which
are found
in that area preserve
so
beautiful
and complete that confirms us to accept the fact that
dinosaur
had
feather
.

Next
, the
passage
expresses that those extra part of dinosaurs was frail
because
remaining
frails
as a
fossil
as more possible;
however
, the professor doesn’t validate the mentioned claim by indicating the fact that the component of
feather
and frail demonstrate us that they were
feather
.

Finally
, the
passage
believes that the position of
feathers
couldn’t
help
dinosaur
.
they
not
only
didn't contribute
dinosaur
to
fly
but
they
also
couldn’t
be conserved
from adverse climate.
Conversely
, the lecturer rejects the
idea
by exemplifies another bird that has same
feather
and can
fly
;
besides
, the colorful
dinosaur
shows
us they definitely had diverse
feathers
on their body.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay fine lines could not represent that the dinosaur had feather. The lecturer, nonetheless, refutes the author's explanations by offering three counterclaims. First, the passage posits that after dying, the animal's skin might have decomposed into f

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
222 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: