The argument states the problem of decreasing revenue due to less amount of soya used in a food manufacturing company and suggestions to combat this issue. A company named Braeburn Corporation is a food manufacturing company which use less soya ratio to make their products. Soya improves health and lessens the cancer risks. The author argues that the advantage of using more soya ratio and their contribution to improving cancer risk will help to popularize their products and eventually their revenue will increase. The arguments seem agreeable but careful reading of the same leave some question to doubt it.
The author should mention the popularity of Braeburn Corporation and inclination if people to buy their products. Reasons to decline in revenue cannot be justified only by examining the ratio of raw materials. It is possible that people like the taste with less soya in their food product and increase in soy might change the taste of the food product due to which the company might be having chances of losing customers. It is mentioned here that soy products are good for health and decreases the risk of cancer but the rate that is salubrious is not mentioned here. If they are using the correct ratio of soya and increase in the same affects the health, then the argument will be abortive.
The revenue declination can have many reasons except less amount of soya. Food companies are having great competition nowadays and people are eclectic in their food choices. It might be possible that they are having another competitor which attracts the customers more and getting popularized widely. In that case, increase in soya amount will not affect the customers and Braeburn Corporation must apply other strategies to gain profit. The competitor might be spreading awareness of using soy products to reduce cancer risk so in that case, they should also imply marketing strategies to attract customers.
In sum, it is not feasible to examine the argument from only one point of view. The Braeburn corporation must construe all the aspects of declination in revenue. I disagree with the statement and the author should mention more reasons to justify the argument.
The
argument
states the problem of decreasing
revenue
due to
less
amount of
soya
used
in a
food
manufacturing
company
and suggestions to combat this issue. A
company
named
Braeburn
Corporation
is a
food
manufacturing
company
which
use
less
soya
ratio
to
make
their
products
.
Soya
improves
health and lessens the
cancer
risks
. The author argues that the advantage of using more
soya
ratio
and their contribution to improving
cancer
risk
will
help
to popularize their
products
and
eventually
their
revenue
will
increase
. The
arguments
seem agreeable
but
careful reading of the same
leave
some
question to doubt it.
The
author should mention the popularity of
Braeburn
Corporation
and inclination if
people
to
buy
their
products
. Reasons to decline in
revenue
cannot
be justified
only
by examining the
ratio
of raw materials. It is possible that
people
like the taste with
less
soya
in their
food
product
and
increase
in soy
might
change
the taste of the
food
product
due to which the
company
might
be having chances of losing customers. It
is mentioned
here that soy
products
are
good
for health and decreases the
risk
of
cancer
but
the rate
that is
salubrious is not mentioned here. If they are using the correct
ratio
of
soya
and
increase
in the same affects the health, then the
argument
will be abortive.
The
revenue
declination can have
many
reasons except
less
amount of
soya
.
Food
companies
are having great competition nowadays and
people
are eclectic in their
food
choices. It
might
be possible that they are having another competitor which attracts the customers more and getting popularized
widely
.
In that case
,
increase
in
soya
amount will not affect the customers and
Braeburn
Corporation
must
apply other strategies to gain profit. The competitor
might
be spreading awareness of using soy
products
to
reduce
cancer
risk
so
in that case
, they should
also
imply marketing strategies to attract customers.
In sum, it is not feasible to examine the
argument
from
only
one point of view. The
Braeburn
corporation
must
construe all the aspects of declination in
revenue
. I disagree with the statement and the author should mention more reasons to justify the
argument
.