A section of the society believes that it is not significant for the government to properly maintain the condition of ancient buildings, while there are others who disagree with this notion. I opine that the government should preserve the ancient constructions. Ideas articulated further in this discourse will discuss both these viewpoints.
People think that replenishing the ancient buildings is not necessary, based on the factors such as time and money. It requires a lot of time to renew ancient buildings, and also the cost involved would be obviously high. For example, cost of the construction materials nowadays are at peak when compared to the material cost during the ancient times. Hence, people seem to be convinced with the fact that it is better to construct a new building instead of wasting money on the old ones.
However, there are a few advantages of renovating the historical buildings which outweighs the advantages associated with demolishing the. Because, these historical buildings paves way for the future generations to gain knowledge about the technological advancement of our ancestors in architecture. For example, Taj Mahal in India, which is one of the 7 wonders of the world, still holds a high value for its architecture. Similarly, the construction of Pyramids are still an unsolved mystery, which clearly depicts the importance of architecture. By renovating these buildings, our children can learn about the architecture in the past which makes them more creative and innovative in the future.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate the fact that the government it is essential for the government to replenish and renovate these historical buildings instead of building new ones by destroying them.
A section of the society believes that it is not significant for the
government
to
properly
maintain the condition of
ancient
buildings
, while there are others who disagree with this notion. I opine that the
government
should preserve the
ancient
constructions.
Ideas
articulated
further
in this discourse will discuss both these viewpoints.
People
think
that replenishing the
ancient
buildings
is not necessary, based on the factors such as time and money. It requires
a lot of
time to renew
ancient
buildings
, and
also
the cost involved would be
obviously
high.
For example
, cost of the construction materials nowadays are at peak when compared to the material cost during the
ancient
times.
Hence
,
people
seem to
be convinced
with the fact that it is better to construct a new
building
instead
of wasting money on the
old
ones.
However
, there are a few advantages of renovating the historical
buildings
which outweighs the advantages associated with demolishing
the.
Because
, these historical
buildings
paves way for the future generations to gain knowledge about the technological advancement of our ancestors in
architecture
.
For example
, Taj Mahal in India, which is one of the 7 wonders of the world,
still
holds a high value for its
architecture
.
Similarly
, the construction of Pyramids are
still
an unsolved mystery, which
clearly
depicts the importance of
architecture
. By renovating these
buildings
, our children can learn about the
architecture
in the past which
makes
them more creative and innovative in the future.
To conclude
, I would like to reiterate the fact that the
government
it is essential for the
government
to replenish and renovate these historical
buildings
instead
of
building
new ones by destroying them.