Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many different countries have most shops and products as the same. Some consider it a positive development, whereas other consider it negative. Discuss both the sides qnd give your opinion.

Most of all countries have mandatory that supermarkets and products are having no differences. Some individuals opine that it is a pragmatic evolution, while other says its a negative expansion. However, I will discuss both the sides and give my potential opinions in the subsequent paragraphs On the one side, as much as there is more evolution in the shops, therefore there is an additional product availability. Consequently, a consumer can easily get the products which fulfill his necessities. In case of that this happened, There is more and more shops and products are available in the short distance, in that the customers have to travel less and get sufficient products in the least time, so that it saves the time as well as fossil fuel. For instance, near my home in the radar of 5 miles, there are 14 supermarkets so whenever, I needed an emergency products, I will get that product effortlessly and Its less time consuming. On the flip side, there is a consequential reason to lead towards the negative expansion. If In the countries, There are a plethora of shops and products are the same, Then it leads towards the agony and jealousy into the shop owners and It hamper them. On the flip side, there is a consequential reason to lead towards the negative expansion. If In the countries, There are a plethora of shops and products are the same, Then it leads towards the agony and jealousy into the shop owners To conclude, In my opinion, A government should pass a law that develop the shop in a certain amount of miles and those shops are far away from one another
Most of all countries have mandatory that supermarkets and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
are having no differences.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
individuals opine that it is a pragmatic evolution, while other says
Did you mean "it's" (="it is") instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
its
a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
expansion.
However
, I will discuss both the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sides
and give my potential opinions in the subsequent paragraphs

On the one side, as much as there is more evolution in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
shops
,
therefore
there is an additional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
product
availability.
Consequently
, a consumer can
easily
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
which fulfill his necessities. In case of that this happened, There is more and more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
shops
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
are available in the short distance, in that the customers
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
travel less and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
sufficient
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
in the least time,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that it saves the time
as well
as fossil fuel.
For instance
, near my home in the radar of
Writing for an international audience? Consider adding the metric equivalent.
5 miles
, there are 14 supermarkets
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
whenever, I needed an emergency
Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean "product"?
products
, I will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
product
effortlessly
and Its less
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
time consuming
.

On the flip side, there is a consequential reason to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lead
towards the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
expansion. If In the countries, There are a plethora of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
shops
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
are the same, Then it leads towards the agony and jealousy into the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
shop
owners and It
Did you mean "hampers"?
hamper
them. On the flip side, there is a consequential reason to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lead
towards the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
expansion. If In the countries, There are a plethora of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
shops
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
are the same, Then it leads towards the agony and jealousy into the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
shop
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
owners


To conclude
, In my opinion, A
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
should pass a law that develop the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
shop
in a certain amount of miles and those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
shops
are far away from one another
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Many different countries have most shops and products as the same. Some consider it a positive development, whereas other consider it negative.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
276 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts