Nowadays there are a lot of services we have to pay for. As a result, many people opine that for parents whose children get a graduation in private schools it is not necessary to pay fees for the supporting of the state educational system. Although there are persuasive arguments on both sides. I truly believe that such a policy could make a positive effect.
To start with, each person is free to choose the way of his life and his children’s life. That is why each parent has an ability to make a decision about the place where his son or daughter would study: it may be a private school or a state school. For each service, a family have to pay some money, but there is no duty to pay for the services they do not use. If a child does not get knowledge from the government, his parents must not pay for it. Such system works with all public services. For example, a citizen who does not use water because of the economy does not pay for it at the end of the period. Therefore, parents whose children study in private schools do not have to pay twice.
Furthermore, for such families the aim of supporting educational system tax may be changed. Families whose children get graduation in other places may need better transport system to get to school, more parking places in the center and other urban facilities. That is may their money could be used in another sphere. To illustrate this, such families may pay a bigger transport fee to make government to build better roads or to fix old ones. In that way the money will be paid for the relevant need.
In conclusion, it is clear that all people should stay in equal positions. I believe that making families free from paying extra fee will balance the costs of parents for the education on the one level.
Nowadays there are
a lot of
services
we
have to
pay
for.
As a result
,
many
people
opine that for
parents
whose
children
get
a graduation in private
schools
it is not necessary to
pay
fees for the supporting of the state educational
system
. Although there are persuasive arguments on both sides. I
truly
believe that such a policy could
make
a
positive
effect.
To
start
with, each person is free to choose the way of his life and his
children’s
life.
That is
why each
parent
has an ability to
make
a decision about the place where his son or daughter would study: it may be a private
school
or a state
school
. For each
service
, a
family
have to
pay
some
money,
but
there is no duty to
pay
for the
services
they do not
use
. If a child does not
get
knowledge from the
government
, his
parents
must
not
pay
for it. Such
system
works with all public
services
.
For example
, a citizen who does not
use
water
because
of the economy does not
pay
for it at the
end
of the period.
Therefore
,
parents
whose
children
study in private
schools
do not
have to
pay
twice.
Furthermore
, for such
families
the aim of supporting educational
system
tax may be
changed
.
Families
whose
children
get
graduation in other places may need better transport
system
to
get
to
school
, more parking places in the center and other urban facilities.
That is
may their money could be
used
in another sphere. To illustrate this, such
families
may
pay
a bigger transport fee to
make
government
to build better roads or to
fix
old
ones. In that way the money will
be paid
for the relevant need.
In conclusion
, it is
clear
that all
people
should stay in equal positions. I believe that making
families
free from paying extra fee will balance the costs of
parents
for the education on the one level.