There is no denying the fact that this is an era of technological advancement. It is
often argued that face-to-face interaction is better than other kinds of high-tech
advanced interactions like chatting, emails, and facetime calls. Personally, I
strongly disagree with this statement for several reasons.
First and foremost, technological communication is absolutely convenient to
participate with others compared to live interaction. To be more precise, modern
technologies serve enormous advantages regarding the participation among
individuals such as easy access, no payment required, and long distances
communication as such desirable methods use the benefit of internet connection.
Generally exemplified, the majority of organizations have started using video
conferences as participants will no longer need to travel.
Furthermore, these modern interaction methods can enhance the better
relationships of humans. In other words, since everybody is able to communicate
with others whenever and wherever they desire, people can comfortably keep in
touch with their family and groups of friends. On the exemplary, today both
parents and children habitually send text messages as a part of lifestyles while
they are far from each other, resulting in stronger family bonding. In this regard, it
is certainly clear that such advanced communications could make society be
more united.
On the flip side, despite the notable benefits of using innovative participation,
face-to-face communication can make people have physical interaction
contributing to numerous enjoyable purposes. More precisely, people will be able
to socialize with others by gathering or hanging out which commonly are the
preferable participation activities among individuals.
In conclusion, high-tech advanced interactions play a significant role in the
convenience of participation and the stronger relationships of society.
Consequently, I would like to reiterate that these modern participation methods
are not worse than live interaction
There is no denying the fact that this is an era of technological advancement. It is
often
argued that face-to-face
interaction
is better than
other
kinds of high-tech
advanced
interactions
like chatting, emails, and
facetime
calls.
Personally
, I
strongly
disagree with this statement for several reasons.
First
and foremost, technological communication is
absolutely
convenient to
participate with others compared to
live
interaction
. To be more precise, modern
technologies serve enormous advantages regarding the
participation
among
individuals such as easy access, no payment required, and long distances
communication as such desirable methods
use
the benefit of internet connection.
Generally
exemplified, the majority of organizations have
started
using video
conferences as participants will no longer need to travel.
Furthermore
, these modern
interaction
methods can enhance the better
relationships of humans. In
other
words, since everybody is able to communicate
with others whenever and wherever they desire,
people
can
comfortably
keep
in
touch with their family and groups of friends. On the exemplary,
today
both
parents and children
habitually
send
text messages as a part of lifestyles while
they are far from each
other
, resulting in stronger family bonding. In this regard, it
is
certainly
clear
that such advanced communications could
make
society be
more united.
On the flip side, despite the notable benefits of using innovative participation,
face-to-face communication can
make
people
have physical interaction
contributing to numerous enjoyable purposes. More
precisely
,
people
will be able
to socialize with others by gathering or hanging out which
commonly
are the
preferable
participation
activities among individuals.
In conclusion
, high-tech advanced
interactions
play a significant role in the
convenience of
participation
and the stronger relationships of society.
Consequently
, I would like to reiterate that these modern
participation
methods
are not worse than
live
interaction