Although the education system has become more advanced, it is often argued that more emphasis is given to theoretical knowledge than inculcating practical skills. I completely support this view, as, in my opinion, most of the educational institutes consider theory subjects as the only criteria for success and make a negligible effort to provide practical knowledge.
The first and foremost reason to support my view is that theoretical proficiency is considered as the only way to measure the success of a student. Owing to this, educators focus mainly on providing theoretical knowledge to them. As a result, there are generally more papers on theory in comparison to practical exams. For instance, statical data by Stanford University stated that on average, children studying in a high school give approximately 50 theoretical papers in a year which is far more than the 10 practical exams.
Secondly, my viewpoint is further bolstered by the fact that most of the children these days generally lack practical skills. This is because there is generally a lack of infrastructure and practical equipment in most of the universities and schools to provide practical skills. As a consequence, students often attend additional courses to acquire practical intelligence in order to earn a lucrative job. To exemplify, more than 80% of computer graduates attend language courses to gain practical skills in computer language.
In conclusion, despite the various advancements in the field of education, in my perspective, more focus is given to factual learning due to the fact that it is the main criteria for identifying toppers and lack of efforts towards providing practical skills.
Although the education system has become more advanced, it is
often
argued that more emphasis is
given
to
theoretical
knowledge than inculcating
practical
skills
. I completely support this view, as, in my opinion, most of the educational institutes consider theory subjects as the
only
criteria for success and
make
a negligible effort to provide
practical
knowledge.
The
first
and foremost reason to support my view is that
theoretical
proficiency
is considered
as the
only
way to measure the success of a student. Owing to this, educators focus
mainly
on providing
theoretical
knowledge to them.
As a result
, there are
generally
more papers on theory
in comparison
to
practical
exams.
For instance
,
statical
data by Stanford University stated that on average, children studying in a high school give approximately 50
theoretical
papers in a year which is far more than the 10
practical
exams.
Secondly
, my viewpoint is
further
bolstered by the fact that most of the children these days
generally
lack
practical
skills
. This is
because
there is
generally
a lack of infrastructure and
practical
equipment in most of the universities and schools to provide
practical
skills
. As a consequence, students
often
attend additional courses to acquire
practical
intelligence in order to earn a lucrative job. To exemplify, more than 80% of computer graduates attend language courses to gain
practical
skills
in computer language.
In conclusion
, despite the various advancements in the field of education, in my perspective, more focus is
given
to factual learning due to the fact that it is the main criteria for identifying toppers and lack of efforts towards providing
practical
skills
.