It is believed that mother and father of a child are responsible to maintain his/her physical health, thus educational institutes should not be teaching sports as a subject to avoid wastage of precious school hours. I certainly disagree with this statement because children spend most of their time at school and learn things quickly along with their peers.
Firstly, the maximum time of a student is spent in school, therefore, he/she can easily involve in sports activities at school. In other words, students can devote a specific period of time for exercising during school hours because they are at school for more than 7 hours a day. However, parents are mostly working, thus cannot spare enough time to provide physical training sessions to their children everyday. Therefore, it is essential that educational institutes have a compulsory subject on physical education. For instance, according to a recent report, several schools in Australia organise sports meet on every other weekend for their students.
Secondly, participation enhances when children are surrounded by pupils of their age. This is to say that a student will indulge in activities that his/her peers are involved in. Moreover, children will take an active part in exercising because they are greatly influenced by their peers. However, creating such an environment by parents at home is not feasible. Therefore, institutes should take the responsibility that children are involved in physical exercise daily. To exemplify, according to a survey conducted by the University of Solan in 2016 in India, 80% of pupils learn new skills at a faster rate in school than at home.
In conclusion, I opine against the notion that parents must ensure their children are regularly involved in sports activities and the schools need not to devote time for physical training as a part of the curricula. This is because a child's presence is more at school, and learning is also enhanced in the school atmosphere.
It
is believed
that mother and father of a child are responsible to maintain his/her
physical
health,
thus
educational institutes should not be teaching
sports
as a subject to avoid wastage of precious
school
hours. I
certainly
disagree with this statement
because
children
spend most of their
time
at
school
and learn things
quickly
along with their peers.
Firstly
, the maximum
time
of a student
is spent
in
school
,
therefore
, he/she can
easily
involve in
sports
activities at
school
.
In other words
, students can devote a specific period of
time
for exercising during
school
hours
because
they are at
school
for more than 7 hours a day.
However
, parents are
mostly
working,
thus
cannot spare
enough
time
to provide
physical
training sessions to their
children
everyday
.
Therefore
, it is essential that educational institutes have a compulsory subject on
physical
education.
For instance
, according to a recent report, several
schools
in Australia
organise
sports
meet
on every other weekend for their students.
Secondly
, participation enhances when
children
are surrounded
by pupils of their age. This is to say that a student will indulge in activities that his/her peers
are involved
in.
Moreover
,
children
will take an active part in exercising
because
they are
greatly
influenced by their peers.
However
, creating such an environment by parents at home is not feasible.
Therefore
, institutes should take the responsibility that
children
are involved
in
physical
exercise daily. To exemplify, according to a survey conducted by the University of
Solan
in 2016 in India, 80% of pupils learn new
skills
at a faster rate in
school
than at home.
In conclusion
, I opine against the notion that parents
must
ensure their
children
are
regularly
involved in
sports
activities and the
schools
need not
to devote
time
for
physical
training as a part of the curricula. This is
because
a child's presence is more at
school
, and learning is
also
enhanced in the
school
atmosphere.