The reading and lecture both describes about the painting ' Potrait of an Elderly woman in a white bonnet' painted by painter Rembrandt. The author of the passage believes that the painting is not done by Rembrandt and puts forward many facts and clues for evidence. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author of the reading. She says that it was painted by Rembrandt and puts forward three main points that wil be discussed below.
First of all, the author of the passage says that the woman in the painting is dressed in a way that is not usually the way how Rembrandt paints his pictures. The woman is dressed in a luxurious fur collar, which is very costly but the hat she wears doesnot look luxurious and rather it looks like servants' cap and concludes that Rembrandt would never do such a mistake. The lecturer rebuts this claim. She says that according to the review of the painting made by the panel of experts, the collar has been painted over the top of it after 100 years so as to increase the value of the painting.
Secondly, the author states that light is reflected on the face of the painting even with the presence of dark fur collar. She is skeptical because of the fact that dark colour would absorb light and hence refelectionn of light is not possible. He says that it is not the style of Rembrandt. The lecturer, on th other hand, contradicts this by saying that if the collar was removed and simple light coloured cloth would surely reflect light.
Finally, the author contends that the painting was done on several pieces of wood sticked together, But usually, Rembrandt qould paint his paintings on wood panels and concludes that it was not his work. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She argues that the wood material on which painting is done is taken from the same tree that Rembrandt used to paint his other paintings. She also shows the example of the self-portrait of Rembrandt to prove this claim.
The reading and lecture both
describes
about the
painting
'
Potrait
of an Elderly woman in a white bonnet' painted by painter Rembrandt. The
author
of the passage believes that the
painting
is not done by Rembrandt and puts forward
many
facts and clues for evidence.
The
lecturer
casts doubt on the claims made by the
author
of the reading. She
says
that it
was painted
by Rembrandt and puts forward three main points that
wil
be discussed
below.
First of all
, the
author
of the passage
says
that the woman in the
painting
is dressed
in a way
that is
not
usually
the way how Rembrandt paints his pictures. The woman
is dressed
in a luxurious fur
collar
, which is
very
costly
but
the hat she wears
doesnot
look luxurious and
rather
it looks like servants' cap and concludes that Rembrandt would never do such a mistake. The
lecturer
rebuts this claim. She
says
that according to the review of the
painting
made by the panel of experts, the
collar
has
been painted
over the top of it after 100 years
so as to
increase the value of the painting.
Secondly
, the
author
states that
light
is reflected
on the face of the
painting
even with the presence of dark fur
collar
. She is skeptical
because of the fact that
dark
colour
would absorb
light
and
hence
refelectionn
of
light
is not possible. He
says
that it is not the style of Rembrandt. The
lecturer
, on
th
other hand, contradicts this by saying that if the
collar
was removed
and simple
light
coloured
cloth would
surely
reflect light.
Finally
, the
author
contends that the
painting
was done
on several pieces of
wood sticked
together,
But
usually
, Rembrandt
qould
paint his
paintings
on wood panels and concludes that it was not his work. This point
is challenged
by the
lecturer
. She argues that the wood material on which
painting
is done
is taken
from the same tree that Rembrandt
used
to paint his other
paintings
. She
also
shows
the example of the self-portrait of Rembrandt to prove this claim.