Owing to the materialization of modern societies, most countries have been encountering the issue of poverty, solving inequality as well as tackling the poverty index. Some people believe that providing charity might improve the situation, while other critics dispute that it can help nothing but just worsen the problem. This essay aims to elaborate on both opposed views and give my opinion finally.
On one hand, there is a common belief that a number of donation funds or organizations could assist those needy communities to sustain their life with fundamental standards, enhancing the quality of life away from the red line. Food banks, for example, are able to provide healthy and adequate food sources to ensure the elementary needs of those needy families for survival, especially for the growth of their children. As a result, the supporters claim that there is a necessity of establishing diverse charity funds to comprehensively subsidize all people who are living under the poverty line.
On the other hand, the opponents argue that those subsidy schemes provided by the charity will have created a self-satisfied sentiment in several lacking people, hindering any improvement for individuals and worsening the poverty situation. In view of a sense of satisfaction after obtaining a charity subsidy, those receivers might lack the motivation to genuinely seek a job. Taking childcare subsidy, for instance, a growing number of people would have acknowledged it as nonsense to work at the rate of the legal minimum wage if they had received much money from the child benefits scheme.
To sum up, the supporting view for offering charity to reduce poverty issue is that it could help for sustaining the survival of those people. On the contrary, the opposing argument recognizes that it may induce a complacent sense to lower the motivation of the poor population being financially independent. Therefore, I personally recommend providing charity wisely, avoiding those impoverished people excessively dependent on those charity funds but consequently looping within the circumstances of poverty.
Owing to the materialization of modern societies, most countries have been encountering the issue of
poverty
, solving inequality
as well
as tackling the
poverty
index.
Some
people
believe that providing
charity
might
improve
the situation, while other critics dispute that it can
help
nothing
but
just
worsen the problem. This essay aims to elaborate on both opposed views and give my opinion
finally
.
On one hand, there is a common belief that a number of donation funds or organizations could assist those needy communities to sustain their life with fundamental standards, enhancing the quality of life away from the red line. Food banks,
for example
, are able to provide healthy and adequate food sources to ensure the elementary needs of those needy families for survival,
especially
for the growth of their children.
As a result
, the supporters claim that there is a necessity of establishing diverse
charity
funds to
comprehensively
subsidize all
people
who are living under the
poverty
line.
On the other hand
, the opponents argue that those subsidy schemes provided by the
charity
will have created a self-satisfied sentiment in several lacking
people
, hindering any improvement for individuals and worsening the
poverty
situation. In view of a sense of satisfaction after obtaining a
charity
subsidy, those receivers might lack the motivation to
genuinely
seek a job. Taking childcare subsidy,
for instance
, a growing number of
people
would have acknowledged it as nonsense to work at the rate of the legal minimum wage if they had received much money from the child benefits scheme.
To sum up, the supporting view for offering
charity
to
reduce
poverty
issue is that it could
help
for sustaining the survival of those
people
.
On the contrary
, the opposing argument recognizes that it may induce a complacent sense to lower the motivation of the poor population being
financially
independent.
Therefore
, I
personally
recommend providing
charity
wisely
, avoiding those impoverished
people
excessively
dependent on those
charity
funds
but
consequently
looping within the circumstances of
poverty
.