Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Do you think God or bad thing ?

Do you think God or bad thing ? 1AMrG
In modern day society, it has become common to make copyright protected material freely available on the Internet with the result that the owners of the work lose large sums of money. The discussion of whether or not this distribution is of positive or negative nature has therefore been raised. Personally, I believe that this issue has both negative and positive effects. Distributing copyright protected material freely online can firstly help make this material more popular. Often people are not willing to spend money on a film or song before being exposed to it once, as they cannot be sure that they will enjoy the material they are about to purchase. If they purchase a song or film and then do not like it, the money spent will have been wasted, which is disappointing. Frequently, people purchase copyright protected material that they enjoyed after being exposed to it once, meaning that often owners often receive money at a later stage. An owner’s reputation can additionally improve, because frequently owners who allow their work to be distributed partially or completely online have a more positive reputation amongst customers. Regardless of the positive effects of the free online distribution of copyright protected material, it can be said that this distribution has several negative effects. Firstly, owners lose large sums of money through it. A lot of time and money can be spent producing the material distributed, as certain spaces and equipment must be rented or bought to produce a certain song or film. Like all other people, artists need money to survive and thus are at a disadvantage when they do not receive money for their work. I personally believe therefore that governments should make sure that when something is performed in public or when work is displayed in public, artists should receive credit and money. In conclusion, it can be said that the online distribution of copyright protected material has both negative and positive effects. In my opinion, it cannot fully be determined whether this distribution is of a positive or negative nature; one must decide upon this for oneself
In modern day society, it has become common to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
copyright
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protected
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
freely
available on the Internet with the result that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
owners
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
lose large sums of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
. The discussion of
Consider shortening this phrase to just "whether". It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
whether or not
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
distribution
is of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
positive
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
negative
nature has
therefore
been raised
.
Personally
, I believe that this issue has both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
negative
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
positive
effects.

Distributing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
copyright
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protected
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
freely
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
can
firstly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
more popular.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Often
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
are not willing to spend
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on a film or song
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
being exposed
to it once, as they cannot be sure that they will enjoy the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
they are about to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
purchase
. If they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
purchase
a song or film and then do not like it, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
spent will have
been wasted
, which is disappointing.
Frequently
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
purchase
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
copyright
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protected
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
that they enjoyed after
being exposed
to it once, meaning that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
owners
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
receive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
at a later stage. An
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
owner’s
reputation can
additionally
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
frequently
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
owners
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
to
be distributed
partially
or completely
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
have a more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
positive
reputation amongst customers.

Regardless of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
positive
effects of the free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
distribution
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
copyright
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protected
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
, it can
be said
that this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
distribution
has several
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
negative
effects.
Firstly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
owners
lose large sums of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
through it.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
A lot of
time and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
can
be spent
producing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
distributed, as certain spaces and equipment
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be rented
or
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
to produce a certain song or film. Like all other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
, artists need
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
to survive and
thus
are at a disadvantage when they do not receive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
for their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
. I
personally
believe
therefore
that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
sure that when something
is performed
in public or when
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
is displayed
in public, artists should receive credit and money.

In conclusion
, it can
be said
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
online
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
distribution
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
copyright
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protected
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
has both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
negative
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
positive
effects. In my opinion, it cannot
fully
be determined
whether this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
distribution
is of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
positive
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
negative
nature; one
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
decide upon this for
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
oneself
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Do you think God or bad thing ?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
348 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts