I agree with the statement that the media provide a tremendous amount of information, but people do not really use this knowledge to fully understand a subject. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, most media outlets now are biased and they have their own agenda. As a result, many individuals do not trust the news or information broadcasted on these channels. In other words, a considerable number in the population just take what they hear on TV with a grain of salt. Almost every organization in this arena has proved that they serve a certain political or social purpose. Consequently, citizens cannot rely on the media to learn about a topic in a broad and scientific way. Take for example climate change issue, many networks devote enough time to inform the public about the dangers of global warming, such as the melting of ice sheets, rising of sea levels and food shortage that could happen. However, some people end up misinformed about this crucial matter. What' s more, those same people go on to deny altogether any increase in temperatures all over the world citing the cold weather in some areas.
Secondly, the limits of time, in case of tv, and space, in case of magazines and newspapers, hinder the ability of these mass communication products to convey all the sides of an argument. Therefore, people could struggle to comprehend certain ideas. From the previous example, the media have failed to offer a detailed explanation for the evidences behind the climate change phenomenon. They could be advocating for switching to renewable energy and cutting carbon emissions. Nevertheless, the viewer is not yet convinced that they have to do something. this is mainly due to the fact that the covering is only superficial and does not help people to totally pick up the scientific theories behind this.
To sum up, people consider today' s media unreliable source of knowledge that is not capable of allowing them to learn something thoroughly. This is because the lack of neutrality and the limitations on time and space that represent obstacles to achieving that goal.
I
agree
with the statement that the
media
provide a tremendous amount of information,
but
people
do not
really
use
this knowledge to
fully
understand a subject. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First
and foremost, most
media
outlets
now
are
biased and
they have their
own
agenda.
As a result
,
many
individuals do not trust the news or information broadcasted on these channels.
In other words
, a considerable number in the population
just
take what they hear on TV with a grain of salt. Almost every organization in this arena has proved that they serve a certain political or social purpose.
Consequently
, citizens cannot rely on the
media
to learn about a topic in a broad and scientific way. Take
for example
climate
change
issue,
many
networks devote
enough
time to inform the public about the
dangers
of global warming, such as the melting of ice sheets, rising of sea levels and food shortage that could happen.
However
,
some
people
end
up misinformed about this crucial matter.
What&
#039; s more, those same
people
go on to deny altogether any increase in temperatures all over the world citing the
cold
weather in
some
areas.
Secondly
, the limits of time, in case of
tv
, and space, in case of magazines and newspapers, hinder the ability of these mass communication products to convey all the sides of an argument.
Therefore
,
people
could struggle to comprehend certain
ideas
. From the previous example, the
media
have failed to offer a detailed explanation for the evidences behind the climate
change
phenomenon. They could be advocating for switching to renewable energy and cutting carbon emissions.
Nevertheless
, the viewer is not
yet
convinced that they
have to
do something.
this
is
mainly
due to the fact that the covering is
only
superficial and does not
help
people
to
totally
pick up the scientific theories behind this.
To sum up,
people
consider
today&
#039; s
media
unreliable source of knowledge
that is
not capable of allowing them to learn something
thoroughly
. This is
because
the lack of neutrality and the limitations on time and space that represent obstacles to achieving that goal.