The issue which lessons and courses should be taught in the high schools has been a contentious matter among the school administrators and the education planners. There is a disputable thought in which the students should have right to choose their lessons that they want to study. To my perspective, students are not enough mature to decide which lessons are fundamental for them and this policy will bring about some problems for both the learners and the societies. To what follows, I delineate my reasons against the statement.
First, all learners should get the comprehensive and systematic schedules of studying. In fact, having a balance of various sciences such as biology, mathematics, physics, and art is a pivotal policy of the basic education in high schools. Less or more, the pupils have to get some definite amount of knowledge on each lesson, which can lead and help them with their practical situations and about their future educations.
Second, students have no clear aim about their interests to decide on what they really feel like studying. In fact, in the high school, a teenager can just ponder and deal with some personal issues such as which school he prefers to go, or with which teacher is more welcoming not more than that. To face with fact; how a teenager can speculate the applicable aspects of physics instructions in the life or the value of perceiving the historical experiences over the time?
The last but not least, the studying plan, curriculum, timetable, or any other policy as to the high school should be done by the dexterous experts. Obviously, anybody has no enough knowledge to manipulate the studying plan which is an advanced schedule planned by the experienced directors and prosperous thinkers.
All in all, by taking all above-mentioned argument in consideration, I reiterate that the thought of selecting courses by the disciples is an inappropriate and wrong policy. Since students have no clear view about the materials and it is the work of professional planners to mull over.
The issue which
lessons
and courses should
be taught
in the
high
schools
has been a contentious matter among the
school
administrators and the education planners. There is a disputable
thought
in which the
students
should have right to choose their
lessons
that they want to study. To my perspective,
students
are not
enough
mature to decide which
lessons
are fundamental for them and this
policy
will bring about
some
problems for both the learners and the societies. To what follows, I delineate my reasons against the statement.
First
, all learners should
get
the comprehensive and systematic schedules of
studying
. In fact, having a balance of various sciences such as biology, mathematics, physics, and art is a pivotal
policy
of the basic education in
high
schools
. Less or more, the pupils
have to
get
some
definite
amount of knowledge on each
lesson
, which can lead and
help
them with their practical situations and about their future educations.
Second,
students
have no
clear
aim about their interests to decide on what they
really
feel like
studying
. In fact, in the
high
school
, a
teenager
can
just
ponder and deal with
some
personal issues such as which
school
he prefers to go, or with which teacher is more welcoming not more than that. To face with fact; how a
teenager
can speculate the applicable aspects of physics instructions in the life or the value of perceiving the historical experiences over the time?
The last
but
not least, the
studying
plan, curriculum, timetable, or any other
policy
as to the
high
school
should
be done
by the dexterous experts.
Obviously
, anybody has no
enough
knowledge to manipulate the
studying
plan which is an advanced schedule planned by the experienced directors and prosperous thinkers.
All in all, by taking all above-mentioned argument in consideration, I reiterate that the
thought
of selecting courses by the disciples is an inappropriate and
wrong
policy
. Since
students
have no
clear
view about the materials and it is the work of professional planners to mull over.