Many people today hold the view that the elderly are more suitable to be leaders but many others suppose that youth leadership is more trustworthy. However, from my perspective, while I think that the old should be in charge of leading society, I agree with the point that young leaders can also do well in their jobs. This essay will discuss the reasons for my view as follow.
Before all else, older people have failed many times and have dealt with different kinds of people hence most of them are very experienced in their fields. From their experience, they can detect risks as well as opportunities, get more skills and insights that youngsters usually don’t. The case of Queen Elizabeth II, who is currently 95 years old strongly exemplifies the idea. Nonetheless, they are quite set in their ways. Specifically, they are reluctant to innovation which makes it harder for them to get closer to the people they lead. On top of that, their lack of technical skills is a great disadvantage in today modern world.
On the other hand, young people, who are often underestimated paradoxically have huge advantages at being leaders. In contrast to the old, they can adapt to new situations really quick as well as be open to new ideas which facilitate them to keep pace with a world that is changing very fast. Jenk Oz, a British CEO at the age of 8 creates a concrete proof that young directors are the best ones. In defiance of their adaptabilities, they are likely to make mistakes in terms of their inexperience. Adding to what has been said, they can’t influence as many as the old do.
In a nutshell, irrespective of age, people have strengths and limitations of their own. It is one’s intelligence, skill, etc. that decides whether he or she can be a great director.
Many
people
today
hold the view that the elderly are more suitable to be leaders
but
many
others suppose that youth leadership is more trustworthy.
However
, from my perspective, while I
think
that the
old
should be in charge of leading society, I
agree
with the point that young leaders can
also
do well in their jobs. This essay will discuss the reasons for my view
as follow
.
Before
all else, older
people
have failed
many
times and have dealt with
different
kinds of
people
hence
most of them are
very
experienced in their fields. From their experience, they can detect
risks
as well
as opportunities,
get
more
skills
and insights that youngsters
usually
don’t. The case of Queen Elizabeth II, who is
currently
95 years
old
strongly
exemplifies the
idea
. Nonetheless, they are quite set in their ways.
Specifically
, they are reluctant to innovation which
makes
it harder for them to
get
closer to the
people
they lead.
On top of that
, their lack of technical
skills
is a great disadvantage in
today
modern world.
On the other hand
, young
people
, who are
often
underestimated
paradoxically
have huge advantages at being leaders.
In contrast
to the
old
, they can adapt to new situations
really
quick
as well
as be open to new
ideas
which facilitate them to
keep
pace with a world
that is
changing
very
fast
.
Jenk
Oz, a British CEO at the age of 8 creates a concrete proof that young directors are the best ones. In defiance of their
adaptabilities
, they are likely to
make
mistakes in terms of their inexperience. Adding to what has
been said
, they can’t influence as
many
as the
old
do.
In a nutshell, irrespective of age,
people
have strengths and limitations of their
own
. It is one’s intelligence,
skill
, etc. that decides whether he or she can be a great director.