Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Discuss how HR managers can indirectly discriminate minorities with the focus on race, gender, and social status.

Discuss how HR managers can indirectly discriminate minorities with the focus on race, gender, and social status. eRDOK
It appeared that today minorities face increasing inequality in the work place. HR managers who are empowered by organizations can discriminate minor groups by denying them jobs through specific biases. Either they propagate organizational policy or their personal prejudices is clearly undefined, but this essay suggests probable patterns of inequality at work that persons face on the basis of their race, sex or social background. Despite the popularity of diversity management initiatives, racism might unconsciously entered the labor market, gradually forming an employment policy toward minority groups. In fact, organizations allow HR managers a high level of control while they tend to hire according to their own preferences when recruiting a potential employee. Judging a candidate by her or his race, recruiters are likely to underestimate their talent, artificially minimizing its significance. Statistically, three out of ten candidates get an economic opportunity to reinforce their status. It is, perhaps, a subtle form of discrimination, when an individual’s professionalism is undermined in the form of solidarity and involvement. On the other hand, individuals face another form of human rights violation – gender inequality. Although discrimination against women may involve various aspects such as salaries, hiring, or personal discrimination, one of the most important issues is considered to be career advancement. It may take longer time for women to get promotion in comparison to men. As a result they experience lower salaries, status, opportunities which lead to personal dissatisfaction and stress. Such discrimination, probably, may result from company’s policy and organizational structure. However, HRs subjective decisions may hugely contribute to women’s promotions. Social status may be one of the key factors when selecting a candidate. It works for both genders similarly. Frequently, HRs want to see an experienced, successful individual, but they reluctantly want to contribute to one’s promotion. According to numerous surveys, the older person is the more social judgment he or she is subjected. It is not so easy to start a career at thirty two even if the one possesses appropriate competencies for a position. To summarise, minority groups are vulnerable communities. By making subjective decisions, HRs may directly discriminate them by color of their skin, sex or social status. In other words, managers may undervalue individuals’ talents, to influence negatively on woman’s promotion, or to skip a skillful candidate because of one’s lower status. In fact, every human being deserves to be an equal part of social community and not to be discriminated by any kind of distinction.
It appeared that
today
minorities face increasing inequality in the work place. HR managers who
are empowered
by organizations can discriminate minor groups by denying them jobs through specific biases. Either they propagate organizational policy or their personal prejudices is
clearly
undefined,
but
this essay suggests probable patterns of inequality at work that persons face on the basis of their race, sex or
social
background.

Despite the popularity of diversity management initiatives, racism might
unconsciously
entered
the labor market,
gradually
forming an employment policy toward minority groups. In fact, organizations
allow
HR managers a high level of control while they tend to hire according to their
own
preferences when recruiting a potential employee. Judging a
candidate
by her or his race, recruiters are likely to underestimate their talent,
artificially
minimizing its significance.
Statistically
, three out of ten
candidates
get
an economic opportunity to reinforce their
status
. It is, perhaps, a subtle form of
discrimination
, when an
individual’s
professionalism
is undermined
in the form of solidarity and involvement.

On the other hand
,
individuals
face another form of human rights violation
gender inequality. Although
discrimination
against women may involve various aspects such as salaries, hiring, or personal
discrimination
, one of the most
important
issues
is considered
to be career advancement. It may take longer time for women to
get
promotion
in comparison
to
men
.
As a result
they experience lower salaries,
status
, opportunities which lead to personal dissatisfaction and
stress
. Such
discrimination
,
probably
, may result from
company
’s policy and organizational structure.
However
,
HRs
subjective decisions may
hugely
contribute to women’s promotions.

Social
status
may be one of the key factors when selecting a
candidate
. It works for both genders
similarly
.
Frequently
,
HRs
want to
see
an experienced, successful
individual
,
but
they
reluctantly
want to contribute to one’s promotion. According to numerous surveys, the older person is the more
social
judgment he or she
is subjected
. It is not
so
easy to
start
a career at
thirty two
even if the one possesses appropriate competencies for a position.

To
summarise
, minority groups are vulnerable communities. By making subjective decisions,
HRs
may
directly
discriminate them by color of their skin, sex or
social
status
.
In other words
, managers may undervalue
individuals’
talents, to influence
negatively
on woman’s promotion, or to skip a skillful
candidate
because
of one’s lower
status
. In fact, every human being deserves to be an equal part of
social
community and not to
be discriminated
by any kind of distinction.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Discuss how HR managers can indirectly discriminate minorities with the focus on race, gender, and social status.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
410 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: