Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that individuals and companies should pay for the pollution they cause but it is not the duty of the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some people believe that individuals and companies should pay for the pollution they cause but it is not the duty of the government. with this opinion? aEOPX
It is argued that pollution should be addressed by individuals and companies who cause the pollution, but not by the government. In my perspective, I partially agree with this opinion because the government should also take some responsibility. On the one hand, these environmental issues should be tackled by the people who caused the pollution. Pollutions never appear for no reasons; they are caused by human activities. Without human activities, there would be no air pollution, global warming, ocean plastic pollution and etc. These problems no only affect people who cause these issues, but also affect every other individual who lives on the earth. In other words, people who didn’t damage the environment become the victims of deterioration of environment because of others’ irresponsible actions. Therefore, these people who destroyed the environment have obligation to restore the damage they caused. Otherwise, everyone would suffer from the catastrophic consequence of damaging environment. On the other hand, the government have responsibility to address environmental problem. There are always some people who do not fulfil their obligation to protect environment. As the government is the only organization which has capability to setup law and organize large activities, obligations which haven’t been fulfilled by the individuals and companies not only should be attained by the government, but also the government should issue some regulations to force people to save environment. This would deter people from destroying environment like emitting harmful and toxic exhaust into the atmosphere, pouring waste chemical suage into rivers and things like that. In conclusion, both the government and people who cause pollution should have responsibility and obligation to save the environment. In this way, all these problems would be resolved.
It
is argued
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
should
be addressed
by individuals and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
cause the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
. In my perspective, I
partially
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this opinion
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should
also
take
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
responsibility.

On the one hand, these environmental issues should
be tackled
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
caused the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Pollutions
never appear for no reasons; they
are caused
by human activities. Without human activities, there would be no air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
, global warming, ocean plastic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
Write the name of the item after 'and' or use only "etc".
and etc
. These problems no
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
affect
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
cause these issues,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
affect every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
individual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
on the earth. In
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
words,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
didn’t damage the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
become the victims of deterioration of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of others’ irresponsible actions.
Therefore
, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroyed
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
obligation
to restore the damage they caused.
Otherwise
, everyone would suffer from the catastrophic consequence of damaging environment.

On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
have responsibility to address environmental problem. There are always
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
do not fulfil their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
obligation
to protect
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
. As the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
is the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
organization which has capability
The verb 'set up' is spelled as two words. The noun 'setup' is spelled as one.
to setup
law and organize large activities,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
obligations
which haven’t
been fulfilled
by the individuals and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
should
be attained
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should issue
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
regulations to force
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to save
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
. This would deter
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from destroying
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
like emitting harmful and toxic exhaust into the atmosphere, pouring waste chemical
Possible spelling mistake found.
suage
into rivers and things like that.

In conclusion
, both the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
cause
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
should have responsibility and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
obligation
to save the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
. In this way, all these problems would
be resolved
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that individuals and companies should pay for the pollution they cause but it is not the duty of the government. with this opinion?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
280 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people believe that individuals and companies should pay for the pollution they cause but it is not the duty of the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?