The importance of getting good health for individuals by the government which was always debatable has now become more controversial with a few people claiming that the government should implement some rules and regulations for the diet of people whereas, it is addressed by others that health is people' personal choice. They can do whatever they want. This essay will further elaborate my views after describing both aspects. There are a plethora of reasons why some people agree with the former assertion. First and the foremost one is that people have busy schedules and they do not have enough time to concentrate on their diet, however if authorities make some stringent laws on nutritious diet then people will focus on their diet which will be fruitful for them. Moreover, the bureaucracy must focus on agricultural things so that farmers will not include chemicals in food. Due to this, people get benefits if the government constructs some rules. Despite having an advantages of making laws on food by authorities, people should take care of themselves. Firstly, individuals are independent about eating; they can eat whatever they want because they are aware what type of foods are beneficial for them. Secondly, it's a person's own responsibility to focus on diet because most of the people who cannot prepare food at home then they always buy from the market. Additionally, the masses want to change their tongue's taste. Therefore, people can eat whatever they want. Following the former view, in this contemporary era, people are suffering from various diseases because they are not taking proper diet, while if it's the responsibility of bureaucracy then they can handle their diet problem. Masses ought to be full of vitamins and nutritious diet. According to the arguments above, one can reach the plausible conclusion that the government should give knowledge to people related to diet and implement laws which will be worthwhile for them.
The importance of getting
good
health for individuals by the
government
which was always debatable has
now
become more controversial with a few
people
claiming that the
government
should implement
some
rules
and regulations for the diet of
people
whereas, it
is addressed
by others that health is
people
' personal choice. They can do whatever they
want
. This essay will
further
elaborate my views after describing both aspects. There are a plethora of reasons why
some
people
agree
with the former assertion.
First
and the foremost one is that
people
have busy
schedules and
they do not have
enough
time to concentrate on their diet,
however
if authorities
make
some
stringent laws on nutritious diet then
people
will focus on their diet which will be fruitful for them.
Moreover
, the bureaucracy
must
focus on agricultural things
so
that farmers will not include chemicals in
food
. Due to this,
people
get
benefits if the
government
constructs
some
rules
. Despite having
an advantages
of making laws on
food
by authorities,
people
should take care of themselves.
Firstly
, individuals are independent about eating; they can eat whatever they
want
because
they are aware what type of
foods
are beneficial for them.
Secondly
, it's a person's
own
responsibility to focus on diet
because
most of the
people
who cannot prepare
food
at home then they always
buy
from the market.
Additionally
, the masses
want
to
change
their tongue's taste.
Therefore
,
people
can eat whatever they
want
. Following the former view, in this contemporary era,
people
are suffering from various diseases
because
they are not taking proper diet, while if it's the responsibility of bureaucracy then they can handle their diet problem. Masses ought to be full of vitamins and nutritious diet. According to the arguments above, one can reach the plausible conclusion that the
government
should give knowledge to
people
related to diet and implement laws which will be worthwhile for them.