Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Did bees are a kind of insect existing now in our life but are they existed on the earth for 200 million years?

Did bees are a kind of insect existing now in our life but are they existed on the earth for 200 million years? PE8g2

Did bees are a kind of insect existing now in our life but are they existed on the earth for 200 million years? . There is a discovery of a fossil of bees inside a 200 million-year-old fossilized tree that may answer this question. The reading and the lecture both deal with the accuracy of this hypothesis. The reading claims that these fossils can not be for bees. However, the lecturer believes there are flaws in the author's claims. The first argument we encounter is the earliest preserved bee is 100 million years old. The professor holds that this is true but it does not mean that the bees existed only in that time. He points out that bees need tree resin to be preserved in it but it was rare 200 million years ago and become common later. On the other hand, the author suggests that because the earliest fossil discovered was 100 million years ago, bees can not exist before this time. Furthermore, the discussion transitions into the absence of flowering plants 200 million years ago which is the main food for the bee. Once more, the speaker dismisses this hypothesis. He asserts that before flowering plants there were nonflowering plants and were the main food for the bee. He adds that later with the appearance of flowering plants, bees adapt to these plants and become their main food. In contrast, the text is convinced that. The writer says that, as a result of the first appearance of flowering plants 125 million years ago, bees can not be live before that time. Last but not least, the final point of view is the structure of discovered fossil lake some of the small details of bees' nests. A final word of contrast is offered by the instructor. He argues that even if there is a lake of structure, there are some chemicals that can prove the accuracy of the discovery. He mentions the analysis found the same waterproof material as modern bees. Although, the author assumes that the fossilized pattern was done by other insects as wood beetles.

Did bees are a kind of insect existing This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
 in our life This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 are they existed on the earth for 200 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withthousandtrillionmuchlottotalsum
million
 years? Don't put a space before the full stop.
.
 There is a discovery of a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
 of bees inside a 200 million-year-This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ancientagedmature
old
 fossilized tree that may answer this question. The reading and the lecture both deal with the accuracy of this hypothesis. The reading claims that these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossils
 can not be for bees. However
, the lecturer believes there are flaws in the author's claims.

The first
 argument we encounter is the earliest preserved bee is 100 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withthousandtrillionmuchlottotalsum
million
 years This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ancientagedmature
old
. The professor holds that this is true This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it does not mean that the bees existed This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 in that time. He points out that bees need tree resin to be preserved
 in it This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it was rare 200 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withthousandtrillionmuchlottotalsum
million
 years ago and become common later. On the other hand
, the author suggests that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the earliest You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
 discovered was 100 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withthousandtrillionmuchlottotalsum
million
 years ago, bees can not exist This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 this time.

Furthermore
, the discussion transitions into the absence of flowering You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 200 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withthousandtrillionmuchlottotalsum
million
 years ago which is the main food for the bee. Once more, the speaker dismisses this hypothesis. He asserts that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 flowering You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 there were nonflowering You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 and were the main food for the bee. He This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accrues
adds
 that later with the appearance of flowering You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
, bees adapt to these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 and become their main food. In contrast
, the text is convinced
 that. The writer says that, as a result
 of the first
 appearance of flowering You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 125 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withthousandtrillionmuchlottotalsum
million
 years ago, bees can not be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 that time.

Last This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 not least, the final point of view is the structure of discovered You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
 lake If the text is a generality, 'of the' is not necessary. Did you mean "some"?some
some of the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :particulars
details
 of bees' nests. A final word of contrast is offered
 by the instructor. He argues that even if there is a lake of structure, there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 chemicals that can prove the accuracy of the discovery. He mentions the analysis found the same waterproof material as modern bees. Although, the author assumes that the fossilized pattern was done
 by other insects as wood beetles. 