Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Developed countries should take more refugees from poorer countries. Do you agree or disagree? v.3

Affluent countries are said to accept more refugees and supply them with the basic needs like shelter and food. I totally disagree with this statement. Since, first of all, immigrants can create conflicts with natives. Secondly, they pose a considerable threat to the development of such countries mentioned above. For one thing, immigrants, who flood in wealthy countries mostly with the aim of making much money and finding better life qualities, seem to be perilous. They can be the reason for regular conflicts with native dwellers, which results in further serious matters. The more refugees means the crowded the state is. Cities may become bustling and this affects the normal daily lives of citizens, anyways. For another thing, refugees always come to affluent states with better life opportunities in mind. After all, they may have negative influence on the improvement of the countries. As the number of immigrants grows, they start requiring more help including food and housing. If countries, even wealthy ones commence the activity of providing refugees more and more, again and again, this may create shortage of the above-mentioned food, housing and so on. Increased number of immigrants shows changes in places. They start settling in. It also means that the possibility of overpopulation, which results in delays in progress in certain countries by all means. In conclusion, wealthy countries need to let foreigner inhabit and they should provide them with the places to live in and foodstuff. In my opinion, this is not true as immigrants tend to make scandals with the population. Moreover, they may make the countries face developmental issues at some point.

Affluent You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
are said
 to accept more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withforeigneralienexileexpatriatedisplaced personemigrant
refugees
 and supply them with the basic needs like shelter and food. I totally
 disagree with this statement. Since, Often, this adverbial phrase is redundant. Consider using “first”.first
first of all
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaliennewcomersettlerforeignermigrant
immigrants
 can create conflicts with natives. Secondly
, they pose a considerable threat to the development of such You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 mentioned above.

For one thing, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaliennewcomersettlerforeignermigrant
immigrants
, who flood in wealthy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
mostly
 with the aim of making much money and finding better life qualities, seem to be perilous. They can be the reason for regular conflicts with native dwellers, which results in further
 serious matters. The more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withforeigneralienexileexpatriatedisplaced personemigrant
refugees
 means the crowded the state is. Cities may become bustling and this affects the normal daily This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 of citizens, anyways.

For another thing, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withforeigneralienexileexpatriatedisplaced personemigrant
refugees
 always This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approacharrive
come
 to affluent states with better life opportunities in mind. After all
, they may have This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 influence on the improvement of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
. As the number of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaliennewcomersettlerforeignermigrant
immigrants
 grows, they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 requiring more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 including food and housing. If You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
, even wealthy ones commence the activity of providing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withforeigneralienexileexpatriatedisplaced personemigrant
refugees
 more and more, again and again, this may create shortage of the above-mentioned food, housing and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 on. Increased number of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaliennewcomersettlerforeignermigrant
immigrants
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratesportraysindicatesdisplays
shows
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :altersadjusts
changes
 in places. They This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 settling in. It also
 means that the possibility of overpopulation, which results in delays in progress in certain You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 by all means.

In conclusion
, wealthy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 need to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
let
 foreigner Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).inhabit, and
inhabit and
 they should provide them with the places to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 in and foodstuff. In my opinion, this is not true as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaliennewcomersettlerforeignermigrant
immigrants
 tend to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 scandals with the population. Moreover
, they may This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 face developmental issues at This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 point. 