It is generally accepted that the government should given authorities to the creator to express their point of view and there should be no limitations because it will halt the imaginary thinking of an artist. I will illustrate my point of view in the following paragraph. To begin with, as we know art is expression of originators emotions, feelings in any form. if the regimes are putting regulations on work of an artist, then it will kills the spirit of democracy. In addition to it everyone has the right to behave, act and live their own way. Moreover, for some people it is great source of income, therefore, they want it to be done perfectly without interference from states, because art does not know the boundaries. Lastly, it has also seen that countries, where all old masters are working without the influence of anyone's judgment, they are earning more and attracting tourists. and eventually it helps in boosting the nations economy. For example France comes at number one position in promoting art work and more of people are visiting this beautiful country to only see old sculptures, paintings and it is raising government budget. On the other hand, some people think that art without filters has negative impact on traditional and cultural values because producer does not know the difference between vulgarity and boldness. Furthermore it also encourage the new generation to indulge in antisocial activities because youngsters are easily affected by violence, crime stories shown on the television. Ii is also evident that movies, songs, with nude scenes encourage the eve teasing, molestation. For example, In India rape rate has shown a significant rise, because of broadcasting of intimate scenes.
To conclude, Although it is fine to put restriction to some extent, However, I strongly believe that there should not be rigid rules and regulations, by doing this we are giving a chance to new talent to flourish.
It is
generally
accepted
that the
government
should
given
authorities to the creator to express their point of view and there should be no limitations
because
it will halt the imaginary thinking of an artist. I will illustrate my point of view in the following paragraph. To
begin
with, as we know
art
is expression of originators emotions, feelings in any form.
if
the regimes are putting regulations on work of an artist, then it will
kills
the spirit of democracy.
In addition
to
it everyone
has the right to behave, act and
live
their
own
way.
Moreover
, for
some
people
it is great source of income,
therefore
, they want it to
be done
perfectly
without interference from states,
because
art
does not know the boundaries.
Lastly
, it has
also
seen
that countries, where all
old
masters are working without the influence of anyone's judgment, they are earning more and attracting tourists.
and
eventually
it
helps
in boosting the
nations
economy.
For example
France
comes
at number one position in promoting
art
work and more of
people
are visiting this
beautiful
country to
only
see
old
sculptures, paintings and it is raising
government
budget.
On the other hand
,
some
people
think
that
art
without filters has
negative
impact on traditional and cultural values
because
producer does not know the difference between vulgarity and boldness.
Furthermore
it
also
encourage
the new generation to indulge in antisocial activities
because
youngsters are
easily
affected
by violence, crime stories shown on the television. Ii is
also
evident that movies, songs, with nude scenes encourage the eve teasing, molestation.
For example
, In India rape rate has shown a significant rise,
because
of broadcasting of intimate scenes.
To conclude
, Although it is fine to put restriction to
some
extent,
However
, I
strongly
believe that there should not be rigid
rules
and regulations, by doing this we are giving a chance to new talent to flourish.