It is believed that economies with extended working hours are more progressive than the countries with comparatively shorter working hours. I completely disagree with this statement and this essay will explain reasons for my argument.
Firstly, longer duration of work is always associated with high cost to the government. To employ labor in any field of occupation, countries spend substantial amount of it’s revenue. If governments decided to increase the average 8 hours duration to 10 hours or more than that, it will obviously escalates the salary of employees as well as state expenditure on remuneration. For example, Japanese government pay twenty percent higher salary to the workers who agree to work extra hours. Consequently, it is common that many nations that have implemented lengthy working times have to face various challenges owing to increasing demand for salary increment. Thus, such policies are extremely problematic and challenging to implement successfully.
Another point to consider is employees become less productive and efficient when it comes to longer job duration. It is a proven fact that when people engaged in similar activities in a longer period of time, the efficiency level and effectiveness decrease due to the fact that it is more exhausted. For example, some countries have become successful by applying 6 hours routine, in light of the fact that labors become more loyal and happy. Conversely, when Japan increased their duration of work, they have experienced increased suicidal rate among their employees due to work-place stress. Accordingly, it is clear that lengthy working hours have not always been economical.
In conclusion, This essay argued that countries with extended duration of work not always successful due to high cost and lower productivity of employees. It is recommended to be more cautious when introducing such policies.
It
is believed
that economies with extended
working
hours
are more progressive than the
countries
with
comparatively
shorter
working
hours
. I completely disagree with this statement and this essay will
explain
reasons for my argument.
Firstly
, longer
duration
of
work
is always associated with high cost to the
government
. To employ labor in any field of occupation,
countries
spend substantial amount
of it’s revenue
. If
governments
decided to increase the average 8
hours
duration
to 10
hours
or more than that, it will
obviously
escalates
the salary of
employees
as well
as state expenditure on remuneration.
For example
, Japanese
government
pay twenty percent higher salary to the workers who
agree
to
work
extra
hours
.
Consequently
, it is common that
many
nations that have implemented lengthy
working
times
have to
face various challenges owing to increasing demand for salary increment.
Thus
, such policies are
extremely
problematic and challenging
to implement
successfully
.
Another point to consider is
employees
become less productive and efficient when it
comes
to longer job
duration
. It is a proven fact that when
people
engaged in similar activities in a longer period of time, the efficiency level and effectiveness decrease due to the fact that it is more exhausted.
For example
,
some
countries
have become successful by applying 6
hours
routine, in light of the fact that labors become more loyal and happy.
Conversely
, when Japan increased their
duration
of
work
, they have experienced increased suicidal rate among their
employees
due to work-place
stress
.
Accordingly
, it is
clear
that lengthy
working
hours
have not always been economical.
In conclusion
, This essay argued that
countries
with extended
duration
of
work
not always successful due to high cost and lower productivity of
employees
. It
is recommended
to be more cautious when introducing such policies.