Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Coal Ash integrated essay top 41 second version

Coal Ash integrated essay top 41 second version aw6bd
Both the reading and the listening are about coal ash. The reading passage believes that new rules on coal ash might not be the best idea. The professor says that new rules are necessary. First of all, The reading points out that strict regulations for companies on coal ash already exist. The reading says that companies use linear in landfills to prevent coal ash leakage. On the other hand, the professor says that this regulation only applies to new disposal ponds. However, with old landfills, there is coal ash leakage into the drinking water. This shows the current regulations are not enough. By standing in the middle between both arguments, I agree with the environmentalists's opinion. Because when we talk about environment, we must keep in mind that the environment is a prior. The whole world is approaching to set new rules and regulations which protect our environment from additional damages. In other words, let's stop ruining our environment and and offer clean environment for the next generations. Secondly, and referring to power companies argument, I would say that the existence of strong regulations and rules is not necessarily that additional regulations are not needed. Also offering some privileges for existing positive coal ash industries is recommended.
Both the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
and the listening are about coal ash. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
passage believes that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rules
on coal ash might not be the best
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
. The professor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
says
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rules
are necessary.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
points out that strict
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
on coal ash already exist. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
says
that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
linear in landfills to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
coal ash leakage.
On the other hand
, the professor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
says
that this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulation
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
applies to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
disposal ponds.
However
, with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
landfills, there is coal ash leakage into the drinking water. This
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
are not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
.

By standing in the middle between both arguments, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the
Did you mean "environmentalist's" or "environmentalists'"?
environmentalists's
opinion.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Because
when we talk about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
, we
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
in mind that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
is a prior. The whole world is approaching to set
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rules
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
which protect our
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
from additional damages.
In other words
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
's
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
ruining our
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
Possible typo: you repeated a word
and and
offer clean
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
for the
next
generations.

Secondly
, and referring to power
Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean "companies'" or "company's"?
companies
argument, I would
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
say
that the existence of strong
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rules
is not
necessarily
that additional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
are not needed.
Also
offering
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
privileges for existing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
coal ash industries
is recommended
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Coal Ash integrated essay top 41 second version

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
207 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Coal Ash integrated essay top 41 second version