Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

According to environmentalists in United States, burning coal in power plants contributes to develop a harmful chemical called coal ash in the ecosystem.

According to environmentalists in United States, burning coal in power plants contributes to develop a harmful chemical called coal ash in the ecosystem. Dl3A7
According to environmentalists in United States, burning coal in power plants contributes to develop a harmful chemical called coal ash in the ecosystem. Those people concerned about it, and they want a new stricter regulation for that activity by the government. However, owners from companies of coal disagree about a new rule, as long as, it would be unnecessary and from their perspective; it might have a negative impact. The listening passage support the idea about new regulation. They strongly believe that the current regulation is insufficient at some point. For example, they require companies to use liner to protect the environment that doesn’t work at all, because they only use liner in case of a new landfill or a new pond. Companies are not require to use in old ponds or landfills. The harmful chemicals from coal ask can be able to leak into ground water and contaminate drinking water. Analysts concern about recycling coal ash and they believe new rules might discourage this procedure. Those analysts pointed out, the fact that recycling coal ash represents a large portion of materials such as concrete and bricks, which reduces disposal in other ways, and it doesn’t represent environmental danger, also infer to increase cost of products made by coal ash. Companies can have no option and increase price of electricity. In the other hand, the listening passage refuse to agree with it. They believe the new regulation no longer will discourage people to use recycle coal ash products. Other danger material for example, mercury can be handle and stored despite the current regulation for a long period, it has been unsafe recycled for over 50 years, and consumers won’t be afraid to buy recycle coal ash products if strict regulations are working out. In addiction the listening explains, even though the price will naturally increase, it wouldn’t be so bad if you look at the math behind it, which is going to represent only 1% average of cost.
According to environmentalists
in United States
, burning coal in power plants contributes to develop a harmful chemical called coal ash in the ecosystem.

Those
people
concerned about it, and they want a
new
stricter
regulation
for that activity by the
government
.
However
, owners from
companies
of coal disagree about a
new
rule
, as long as, it would be unnecessary and from their perspective; it might have a
negative
impact. The listening passage support the
idea
about
new
regulation
. They
strongly
believe that the
current
regulation
is insufficient at
some
point.
For example
, they require
companies
to
use
liner to protect the environment that doesn’t work at all,
because
they
only
use
liner in case of a
new
landfill or a
new
pond.
Companies
are not
require
to
use
in
old
ponds or landfills. The harmful chemicals from coal ask can be able to leak into ground water and contaminate drinking water.

Analysts concern about recycling coal
ash and
they believe
new
rules
might discourage this procedure. Those analysts pointed out, the fact that recycling coal ash represents a large portion of materials such as concrete and bricks, which
reduces
disposal in other ways, and it doesn’t represent environmental
danger
,
also
infer to increase cost of products made by coal ash.
Companies
can have no option and increase price of electricity. In the other hand, the listening passage refuse to
agree
with it. They believe the
new
regulation
no longer will discourage
people
to
use
recycle coal ash products. Other
danger
material
for example
, mercury can be
handle
and stored despite the
current
regulation
for a long period, it has been unsafe recycled for over 50 years, and consumers won’t be afraid to
buy
recycle coal ash products if strict
regulations
are working out. In addiction the listening
explains
,
even though
the price will
naturally
increase, it wouldn’t be
so
bad
if you look at the math behind it, which is going to represent
only
1% average of cost.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay According to environmentalists in United States, burning coal in power plants contributes to develop a harmful chemical called coal ash in the ecosystem.

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
328 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 6band
    Should art and music be compulsory subjects?
    As per my opinion arts and music should be compulsory subject because it gives time for student to divert from only listening and learning in school which becomes monotonous for students and sometimes it becomes reason for lack of concentration. Schools should give an option to select either arts or...
  • 6band
    Playing a game is fun only when you win. Agree/Disagree?
    I strongly disagree with the statement playing a game only when you win. And the reason behind my disagreement with this is because a person used to learn a lot from games they play. Game could be any one. It may be indoor or outdoor but both have their own benefits. For example if a person is inter...
  • 6.5band
    TOEFL integrated Question: the extinction of Steller's sea cow.
    Both the reading and the lecture discuss three theories about the main causes of Steller's sea cow extinction. While the author claims that these theories contribute to the main causes of this event, the professor disagrees and provides some pieces of evidence to state that these theories would not ...
  • 6.5band
    After the industrialization, the lifestyle of people changed; especially, the younger's lifestyle has changed dramatically.
    After the industrialization, the lifestyle of people changed; especially, the younger's lifestyle has changed dramatically. In my view, nowadays young people are living more independent than in the past. They are now able to decide the manner of their life themselves, however, in the past, they were...
  • 6.5band
    " we should pay attention to the opinions of famous people" ?
    Some people think that famous people have an extraordinary life and know everything, so they believe that it is better to follow what famous people do and pay attention to their opinions. However, others think that famous people are like ordinary people and they may do not have enough knowledge abou...
  • 6band
    The reading and the lecture both discuss eleventh century silver coin and Norse settlements.
    The reading and the lecture both discuss eleventh century silver coin and Norse settlements. While the reading states that this coin are not genuine historical evidence and provide three reasons of support, the lecture refutes this, saying in favor of that topic and support that it is genuine. Firs...





Get more results for topic: