Freedom is considered a truly universal phenomenon in today's global scenario. Recent studies over the issues of freedom suggest that there is a high chance these event are to heighten in the coming years considering the current trajectory of the modern world. In this context an issue which is fast becoming a fixture of many discussions concerns to the extent to which children should be given freedom. This is a shall analyse the issue from every angle and argue that children's freedom should be restricted. In the list of arguments supporting some people's perspective that children should be given more freedom, one of the most dynamic is that freedom breeds creativity and motivation. It is not uncommon to find western countries coming up with innovative ideas by giving freedom to their children from a very young age. The proponents of this view also feels that freedom guarantees stress-free life for children and the very essence of childhood can be upheld this way. However, it would be possible to easily slash the above-mentioned arguments into shreds with reference to cultural erosions it engenders in the society. Cultural erosion in the traditional societies means people are desensitized both emotionally and morally which subsequently results in poorer lifestyle. Hence it is clear that the above-mentioned perspective fails to present itself as a comprehensive model that addresses the overall well being of all participants involved. A swift examination of the issue in hand would give as a plenitude of reasons supporting my view that children's freedom should be restricted. To begin with it can be safely assumed that such freedom often result in poor academic performance of children. It is possible that children might pursue avenues of pleasure and entertainment if given more freedom and that which could adversely affect the academic prospects. I also feel that if children are not trained to obey rules, could destabilize the society in the long term as children may disrespect symbols of authorities and the end result would be chaos and lawlessness lawlessness. Finally it wouldn't be to off the mark if I opined that children when presented with excess freedom may turn dangerous to the society as a whole as the many incidents of gun-toting western children shooting everyone in sight bear witness.
Having considered both sides, it seems I was so sensible to register my disagreement to the statement that children should be given more freedom. In spite of the detailed tapestory of argument clearly placed in favour of freedom it seems so and convincing to my psyche aur subtextual basis. It is also evident that while the downsides of providing freedom of tangible, profound and enormously consequential consequential, the benefits of ephemeral, superficial and beyond a point stop to be palpable in the long run. Suffice to say that it is best to to restrict the freedom of children
Freedom
is considered
a
truly
universal phenomenon in
today
's global scenario. Recent studies over the
issues
of
freedom
suggest that there is a high chance these
event
are to heighten in the coming years considering the
current
trajectory of the modern world. In this context an
issue
which is
fast
becoming a fixture of
many
discussions concerns to the extent to which
children
should be
given
freedom
. This is a shall
analyse
the
issue
from every angle and argue that children's
freedom
should
be restricted
. In the list of arguments supporting
some
people
's perspective that
children
should be
given
more
freedom
, one of the most dynamic is that
freedom
breeds creativity and motivation. It is not uncommon to find western countries coming up with innovative
ideas
by giving
freedom
to their
children
from a
very
young age. The proponents of this view
also
feels that
freedom
guarantees
stress
-free life for
children
and the
very
essence of childhood can
be upheld
this way.
However
, it would be possible to
easily
slash the above-mentioned arguments into shreds with reference to cultural
erosions it
engenders in the
society
. Cultural erosion in the traditional
societies
means
people
are desensitized
both
emotionally
and
morally
which
subsequently
results in poorer lifestyle.
Hence
it is
clear
that the above-mentioned perspective fails to present itself as a comprehensive model that addresses the
overall
well being
of all participants involved. A swift examination of the
issue
in hand would give as a plenitude of reasons supporting my view that children's
freedom
should
be restricted
. To
begin
with it can be
safely
assumed that such
freedom
often
result in poor academic performance of
children
. It is possible that
children
might pursue avenues of pleasure and entertainment if
given
more
freedom
and that which could
adversely
affect the academic prospects. I
also
feel that if
children
are not trained to obey
rules
, could destabilize the
society
in the long term as
children
may disrespect symbols of authorities and the
end
result would be chaos and
lawlessness lawlessness
.
Finally
it wouldn't be to off the mark if I opined that
children
when presented with excess
freedom
may turn
dangerous
to the
society
as a whole as the
many
incidents of gun-toting western
children
shooting everyone in sight bear witness.
Having considered both sides, it seems I was
so
sensible to register my disagreement to the statement that
children
should be
given
more
freedom
.
In spite of
the detailed
tapestory
of argument
clearly
placed in
favour
of
freedom
it seems
so
and convincing to my psyche
aur
subtextual basis. It is
also
evident that while the downsides of providing
freedom
of tangible, profound and
enormously
consequential consequential
, the benefits of ephemeral, superficial and beyond a point
stop
to be palpable in the long run. Suffice to say that it is best
to to
restrict the
freedom
of
children