Some people suggest that affording children over fifteen the right to vote would lead to a
better society. After all, the more voices are heard in a democracy, the more legitimacy
elected leaders have. Be that as it may, I believe thatsociety would actually be worse off if
fifteen-year-olds were allowed to vote. Teenagers are too immature to vote, and often simply
copy the preferences of their parents.
First and foremost, fifteen, is simply put, not very old. Children at that age lack the emotional
maturity needed to make intelligent decisions when voting. They often feel passionately about
a topic one day only to have their interest fizzle out the next; clearly, that causes problems
when the decisions made affect people throughout society. Moreover, fifteen-year-olds lack
the sophistication needed to distinguish between truly valuable causes and those that are
merely exciting. Politicians would simply speak to the emotions of the younger voters during
speeches, and teenagers might vote for frivolous policies, such aslonger school vacations.
However, voting should not be taken so lightly—no choice, arguably, could be of more
importance.
I also believeit would be a mistake to allow fifteen-year-olds to vote because they are likely to
simply copy the preferences of their parents. For example, during elections, voters are often
influenced by economic factors, such as promises to provide tax breaks, the expansion of
social aid programs. But fifteen-year-olds are not economically independent. Their financial
situations depend on those of their parents. For this reason, their parents would influence
them to vote to most help the family financially, which is not honest democracy. To make
matters worse, politicians would realize that families usually vote in the same way, and start
emphasizing policies helping families at the expense of other interest groups in order to get
their votes. For instance, politicians might promise to raise money for schools by taxing
businesses. This would effectively give parents a disproportionately large influence.
Essentially, there is a good reason that virtually no country on the planet allows people who
are so young to vote. They have yet to mature into responsible tax-paying citizens. As
mentioned, their interests are fickle, and not aligned with what is best for society as a whole. It
would be a mistake to give them influence in the democratic process.
Some
people
suggest that affording children over fifteen the right to
vote
would lead to a
better
society.
After all
, the more voices
are heard
in a democracy, the more
legitimacy
elected
leaders have. Be that as it may, I believe thatsociety would actually be worse off
if
fifteen-year-olds
were
allowed
to
vote
.
Teenagers
are too immature to
vote
, and
often
simply
copy
the preferences of their parents.
First
and foremost, fifteen, is
simply
put, not
very
old
. Children at that age lack the
emotional
maturity
needed to
make
intelligent decisions when voting. They
often
feel
passionately
about
a topic one day
only
to have their interest fizzle out the
next
;
clearly
, that causes problems
when
the decisions made affect
people
throughout society.
Moreover
, fifteen-year-olds lack
the sophistication needed to distinguish between
truly
valuable causes and those that are
merely
exciting. Politicians would
simply
speak to the emotions of the younger voters
during
speeches
, and
teenagers
might
vote
for frivolous policies, such aslonger school vacations.
However
, voting should not
be taken
so
lightly
—no choice,
arguably
, could be of more
importance
.
I
also
believeit would be a mistake to
allow
fifteen-year-olds to
vote
because
they are likely to
simply
copy the preferences of their
parents
.
For example
, during elections, voters are
often
influenced by economic factors, such as promises to provide tax breaks, the expansion of
social
aid programs.
But
fifteen-year-olds are not
economically
independent. Their
financial
situations
depend on those of their
parents
.
For this reason
, their
parents
would
influence
them
to
vote
to most
help
the family
financially
, which is not honest democracy. To
make
matters worse, politicians would realize that families
usually
vote
in the same way
, and
start
emphasizing policies helping families at the expense of other interest groups in order to
get
their
votes
.
For instance
, politicians might promise to raise money for schools by
taxing
businesses
. This would
effectively
give
parents
a
disproportionately
large influence.
Essentially
, there is a
good
reason that
virtually
no country on the planet
allows
people
who
are
so
young to
vote
. They have
yet
to mature into responsible tax-paying citizens. As
mentioned
, their interests are fickle, and not aligned with what is best for society as a whole. It
would
be a mistake to give them influence in the democratic process.