Many countires are charging death penalty to the people who commited murder as punishment. Some pepole believe that while punishing death penalties the society is also commiting crime. In substitute of this type of punishment, murderers can also be kept in prision for life long. This essay will argue why the life in prison is better punishment option for murderers rather than sentencing them with death penalties.
The law of countries always seek to be harsh on people who commit crime in order to maintain peace. The criminals are usually punished on the basis of severity of the crime thay have committed in order to discourage them from repeating again and to indirectly threatened those who intened to commit crime. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Dubai have adopted strict punishment mechanisms such as death penalty. These mechanisms have resulted in a sense of threats to peoples having criminal mindset. Because of this, crime rate in there is very low. Hence, setting the punishment like death penalty to murderers helps to decrease possible crime and maintains peaceful environment.
Despite the law of the country should be strict, there is no point in killing people for their crime. If people try to change their habit and nature, they can do so. Moreover, everyone has right to get a second chance to improve themselves. Similarly, killing humans for their sins is not going to improve the victim and his family conditions. Some countries have completely eliminated the provision of death penalty for murderers considering these facts and switched to life in prison. Therefore, the idea of killing people to rectify their crime is neither going to benefit victim nor establishes social justices.
This essay argued that charging death penalties to murderers may help to decrease crime to some extend but it does not provide justice to victim and also not perceived good from social perspective. In my opinion, all murderers should spend their whole life in prison in exchange of death penalty for committing murders.
Many
countires
are charging death
penalty
to the
people
who
commited
murder as
punishment
.
Some
pepole
believe that while punishing death
penalties
the society is
also
commiting
crime
. In substitute of this type of
punishment
,
murderers
can
also
be
kept
in
prision
for
life
long. This essay will argue why the
life
in prison is better
punishment
option for
murderers
rather
than sentencing them with death penalties.
The law of
countries
always seek to be harsh on
people
who commit
crime
in order to maintain peace. The criminals are
usually
punished on the basis of severity of the
crime
thay
have committed in order to discourage them from
repeating again
and to
indirectly
threatened those who
intened
to commit
crime
.
Countries
like Saudi Arabia and Dubai have adopted strict
punishment
mechanisms such as death
penalty
. These mechanisms have resulted in a sense of threats to
peoples
having criminal mindset.
Because of this
,
crime
rate in there is
very
low.
Hence
, setting the
punishment
like death
penalty
to
murderers
helps
to decrease possible
crime
and maintains peaceful environment.
Despite the law of the
country
should be strict, there is no point in killing
people
for their
crime
. If
people
try to
change
their habit and nature, they can do
so
.
Moreover
, everyone has right to
get
a second chance to
improve
themselves.
Similarly
, killing humans for their sins is not going to
improve
the victim and his family conditions.
Some
countries
have completely eliminated the provision of death
penalty
for
murderers
considering these facts and switched to
life
in prison.
Therefore
, the
idea
of killing
people
to rectify their
crime
is neither going to benefit victim nor establishes social justices.
This essay argued that charging death
penalties
to
murderers
may
help
to decrease
crime
to
some
extend
but
it does not provide justice to victim and
also
not perceived
good
from social perspective. In my opinion, all
murderers
should spend their whole
life
in prison
in exchange of
death
penalty
for committing murders.