Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

By 2030 many people think the world will have changed disastrously. Do you agree or disagree?

By 2030 many people think the world will have changed disastrously. 56Lpn

According to many environmentalists, the rate at which we, the people, are exploiting the mother nature, the world will change disastrously by the year 2030. I completely agree with the thoughts of such people because of pollution and environmental degradation, which are caused by human activities. To meet the demands of the growing world population, people are rapidly depleting natural resources. These natural resources are generally non-renewable and take millions of years to produce. Natural resources such as fossil fuels that have a high amount of carbon in it are the primary source of energy production. The utilisation of such resources causes pollution, which in turn plays an important role in a temperature increase in the world, i. e. , global warming. This phenomenon has been in the buzz for the last two decades. Increased global temperature has caused the polar caps to melt, causing increased sea level. Recent studies have shown that major coastal cities will go extinct in near future, hence changing the world geography completely. To afford the growing numbers of people in the world, we are cutting down the forests and thus, we are forcing many creatures and plants to extinct from the world. Extinction of these forests makes it impossible for us to cope with increased pollution that we make for energy production. This also heavily impacts the climate of the world and creates major rifts in nature. Take, the tsunami for an example, it is caused by the earthquakes in oceans, which in turn caused by the movement of the tectonic plates. Disasters like these troubles many regions of the world. Such a phenomenon can be avoided by maintaining the balance between us and the mother nature. In conclusion, I would like to support the irrefutable notion of the people that earth would be completely changed, if not early, by the year 2030. Humans are now understanding the threat and are trying to find new alternative and innovative ideas to avoid using non-renewable natural resources. But if the rate of pollution, with an increased rate of the world population, as well as the rate of environmental degradation is not slowed, we would be definitely looking at the world disaster.

According to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 environmentalists, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 at which we, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
, are exploiting the mother nature, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteradjust
change
disastrously
 by the year 2030. I completely This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with the thoughts of such You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 and environmental degradation, which are You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbegincreateinduceproduceprecipitateprovoke
caused
 by human activities.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :attain
meet
 the demands of the growing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 population, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 are rapidly
 depleting You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinnatelogicallegitimatereasonableinstinctiveordinary
natural
 resources. These You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinnatelogicallegitimatereasonableinstinctiveordinary
natural
 resources are generally
 non-renewable and take millions of years to produce. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinnatelogicallegitimatereasonableinstinctiveordinary
Natural
 resources such as fossil fuels that have a high amount of carbon in it are the primary source of energy production. The Possible spelling mistake. 'utilisation' is British English.utilization
utilisation
 of such resources causes You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
, which in turn plays an This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 role in a temperature increase in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
, There should be no space here: "i.e.".i.e.
i. e.
Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma,
 ,
 global warming. This phenomenon has been in the buzz for the last two decades. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheightenedexpanded
Increased
 global temperature has You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbegincreateinduceproduceprecipitateprovoke
caused
 the polar caps to melt, causing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheightenedexpanded
increased
 sea level. Recent studies have shown that major coastal cities will go extinct in near future, hence
 changing the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 geography completely.

To afford the growing numbers of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
, we are cutting down the forests and thus
, we are forcing This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 creatures and plants to extinct from the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
. Extinction of these forests This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createsconstructsmanufacturesproduces
makes
 it impossible for us to cope with You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheightenedexpanded
increased
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 that we This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 for energy production. This also
heavily
 impacts the climate of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 and creates major rifts in nature. Take, the tsunami for an example, it is You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbegincreateinduceproduceprecipitateprovoke
caused
 by the earthquakes in oceans, which in turn You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbegincreateinduceproduceprecipitateprovoke
caused
 by the movement of the tectonic plates. Disasters like these troubles This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 regions of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
. Such a phenomenon can be avoided
 by maintaining the balance between us and the mother nature.

In conclusion
, I would like to support the irrefutable notion of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 that earth would be completely This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteredadjusted
changed
, if not early, by the year 2030. Humans are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
 understanding the threat and are trying to find new alternative and innovative This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtsconceptsnotions
ideas
 to avoid using non-renewable You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinnatelogicallegitimatereasonableinstinctiveordinary
natural
 resources. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
 if the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
, with an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheightenedexpanded
increased
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 population, as well
 as the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 of environmental degradation is not slowed, we would be definitely looking at the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 disaster. 