Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

businesses are interested to hire retired control governors who have experience in surveying the same field

businesses are interested to hire retired control governors who have experience in surveying the same field gDKD7
Frequently businesses are interested to hire retired control governors who have experience in surveying the same field. However, there are individuals who criticize this idea, as it may provoke the conflict of interests. Personally, I agree that former political regulators cannot be allowed to obtain these jobs due to the high risk of advantages they may take. A good reason to abolish previously related jobs to former authorities is that a person may be tempted to choose their own interests over job responsibilities. Whereas old professional connections are most likely to kept, an employee ought to exploit their position for individual or corporative gain. For example, while negotiating with new clients, they may put their own interest ahead of their clients’. Therefore, in this case the company’s reputation may be damaged if not ruined. Another point to consider is that former regulators are often given the jobs in the areas which they had been inspecting earlier in order to lobby new employers’ interests and extinguish competitors in a dishonest way. The fundamental rule of the market economy is a fair competition, and in such a case it can be broken by corrupt schemes. Consequently, doing business under this type of circumstances is unacceptable. All in all, I am of the opinion that for any post it’s only the experience that ought to play a crucial role. Political or authority background should not be a key factor while hiring a new candidate, as an industry is careful about their reputation, they would make any effort to avoid any case which might destroy their name or repute.
Frequently
businesses
are interested
to hire retired control governors who have experience in surveying the same field.
However
, there are individuals who criticize this
idea
, as it may provoke the conflict of
interests
.
Personally
, I
agree
that former political regulators cannot be
allowed
to obtain these
jobs
due to the high
risk
of advantages they may take.

A
good
reason to abolish previously related
jobs
to former authorities is that a person may
be tempted
to choose their
own
interests
over
job
responsibilities. Whereas
old
professional connections are most likely to
kept
, an employee ought to exploit their position for individual or
corporative
gain.
For example
, while negotiating with new clients, they may put their
own
interest
ahead of their clients’.
Therefore
,
in this case
the
company
’s reputation may
be damaged
if not ruined.

Another point to consider is that former regulators are
often
given
the
jobs
in the areas which they had been inspecting earlier in order to lobby new employers’
interests
and extinguish competitors
in a dishonest way
. The fundamental
rule
of the market economy is a
fair
competition, and in such a case it can
be broken
by corrupt schemes.
Consequently
, doing business under this type of circumstances is unacceptable.

All in all, I am of the opinion that for any post it’s
only
the experience that ought to play a crucial role. Political or authority background should not be a key factor while hiring a new candidate, as an industry is careful about their reputation, they would
make
any effort to avoid any case which might
destroy
their name or repute.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay businesses are interested to hire retired control governors who have experience in surveying the same field

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
265 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts