In this contemporary, era due to advancement of technology people are more rely on it such as flights which is rapidly increasing day by day and it has adverse impact on environment which is facing by several countries but some reckon that implying more tax on aircrafts is the only way to reduce in usage of planes among traveller. I am agree with the given statement and reasons for my inclination is given in trial trial in trial trial paragraphs.
To begin with, there are several solution if tax is levying more on air transport. Foremost one is, fewer usage of domestic flights because people who commute for shorter distance in their leisure time they become lesser and instead of flight they use other transport system by car or rail network. To illustrate, according to the recent survey conducted by Times of India they concluded that in 2018 by implying tax on flights there was almost 37% of traveller stop using domestic flights and increase in other means of transport. As a result, there will be a less toxic gas release in air and protect environment from damage. Moreover, white petrol which is used in flights maybe decline and save in fossil fuel to to large extent. Since, there is a less amount of pure fuel is remaining on earth and it is important to save for future for future for future. Lastly, if administration implying more tax on planes. Thus, government can generate more revenue from foreign tourist and they contribute it for the development of nation.
Unfortunately, there are a number of cons if tax is imposed on flights. Firstly, middle class people are not able to to get the experience of light of light light owing to this, their financial condition is not strong to pay extra tax. Therefore, public use vehicle to commute other place like private car or bike which also pollute the environment. Furthermore, in case of any emergency such as as as for business purpose and they have to reach in short span of span of time so, flight is very convenient for them but, because of text implied by government on air transportation business travelers do not use domestic flight. Hence, tax will be collected by private groups instead of government.
In conclusion, it is inferred that, by imposing tax have negative sides such as experience, business purpose, and many other; However, I believe that text should levying on flights to protect environment, GDP growth, and save fossil fuels.
In this contemporary, era due to advancement of technology
people
are more rely on it such as
flights
which is
rapidly
increasing day by day and it has adverse impact on
environment
which is facing by several countries
but
some
reckon that implying more
tax
on
aircrafts
is the
only
way to
reduce
in usage of
planes
among
traveller
. I am
agree
with the
given
statement and reasons for my inclination is
given
in
trial
trial
in
trial
trial
paragraphs.
To
begin
with, there are several solution if
tax
is levying more on air transport. Foremost one is, fewer usage of domestic
flights
because
people
who commute for shorter distance in their leisure time they become lesser and
instead
of
flight
they
use
other
transport system by car or rail network. To illustrate, according to the recent survey conducted by Times of India they concluded that in 2018 by implying
tax
on
flights
there was almost 37% of
traveller
stop
using domestic
flights
and increase in
other
means of transport.
As a result
, there will be a less toxic gas release in air and protect
environment
from damage.
Moreover
, white petrol which is
used
in
flights
maybe decline and save in fossil fuel
to to
large extent. Since, there is a less amount of pure fuel is remaining on earth and it is
important
to save
for future for future
for future.
Lastly
, if administration implying more
tax
on
planes
.
Thus
,
government
can generate more revenue from foreign
tourist and
they contribute it for the development of nation.
Unfortunately, there are a number of cons if
tax
is imposed
on
flights
.
Firstly
, middle
class
people
are not able
to to
get
the experience
of light of light
light owing to this, their financial condition is not strong to pay extra
tax
.
Therefore
, public
use
vehicle to commute
other
place like private car or bike which
also
pollute the
environment
.
Furthermore
, in case of any emergency such
as as
as for business
purpose and
they
have to
reach in short
span of span of
time
so
,
flight
is
very
convenient for them
but
,
because
of text implied by
government
on air transportation business travelers do not
use
domestic
flight
.
Hence
,
tax
will
be collected
by private groups
instead
of
government
.
In conclusion
, it
is inferred
that, by imposing
tax
have
negative
sides such as experience, business purpose, and
many
other
;
However
, I believe that text should
levying
on
flights
to protect
environment
, GDP growth, and save fossil fuels.