Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

BothGovernment and individuals are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats. This money could be better spent dealing with the fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? v.1

BothGovernment and individuals are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats. This money could be better spent dealing with the fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. v. 1
Government is investing, financial support to every sector. Nowadays, not only power authorities, but also several individuals supporting the animal protection scheme by spending a large amount of money some people consider that it is more effective if this fund utilised for major social issues such as poverty and medical care. To a great extent I disagree with this statement. To commence with, humans and animals are living on Earth with a coexistence attitude. The decline of animals and their habitat may adversely affect the life of the ecosystem where humans are also a part. Proper protection of the natural home or environment of animals may encourage people's food productivity. Thus, can reduce the rate of poverty. For example, some of the plant pollination or growth is strengthened by the support of animals, so the decline of animal kingdom affects the progress of the plantation. Hence the funds to animal and habitat protection is also fundamental. Moreover, due to the inventions of modern technology is the healthcare field had a drastic information system. In every year government spending a proper amount of money to support the medical care units. If the law enforcement organisations give more assistance to medication, it affects the humans and nature harmony. Therefore, the amount used to protect the animals does not be a waste of money. Meanwhile that enables earth to maintain its peace. To conclude, it is true that a social problem such as poverty and medical care should be supported in its fullest. But to balance the life in the earth, government must take enough care of nature and animals by investing proper funds.
Government
is investing, financial support to every sector. Nowadays, not
only
power authorities,
but
also
several individuals supporting the
animal
protection scheme by spending a large amount of money
some
people
consider that it is more effective if this fund
utilised
for major social issues such as poverty and medical
care
. To a great extent I disagree with this statement.

To commence with, humans and
animals
are living on Earth with a coexistence attitude. The decline of
animals
and their habitat may
adversely
affect the life of the ecosystem where humans are
also
a part. Proper protection of the natural home or environment of
animals
may encourage
people
's food productivity.
Thus
, can
reduce
the rate of poverty.
For example
,
some of the
plant pollination or growth
is strengthened
by the support of
animals
,
so
the decline of
animal
kingdom affects the progress of the plantation.
Hence
the funds to
animal
and habitat protection is
also
fundamental.

Moreover
, due to the inventions of modern technology is the healthcare field had a drastic information system. In every year
government
spending a proper amount of money to support the medical
care
units. If the law enforcement
organisations
give more assistance to medication, it affects the humans and nature harmony.
Therefore
, the amount
used
to protect the
animals
does not be a waste of money.
Meanwhile
that enables earth to maintain its peace.

To conclude
, it is true that a social problem such as poverty and medical
care
should
be supported
in its fullest.
But
to balance the life in the earth,
government
must
take
enough
care
of nature and
animals
by investing proper funds.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes

IELTS essay BothGovernment and individuals are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats. This money could be better spent dealing with the fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
271 words
7.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts