Both the lecture and the passage comment buzzers who are recruited to advertise the product in diverse ways; actually, when companies encountered to the issue that people don't pay enough attention to their advertisement changed their methods.

Both the lecture and the passage comment buzzers who are recruited to advertise the product in diverse ways; actually, when companies encountered to the issue that people don't pay enough attention to their advertisement changed their methods. The article brings three hypothesized for revealing the claim that this method isn't logical; nonetheless, the lecturer puts all reasons under question. According to the speakers, none of those are convincing. First, as the passage mentioned, companies are lying to people for increasing the rate of selling; however, the lecturer dismissed the claim by emphasizing that a person who is employed for introducing a commodity have tried that; in other words, managers of company find buyers who believe that their product is helpful; therefore, they tell the true. the man exemplifies his self. He works in a phone company where he has taken the advantages of its phone. Next, the speaker declares that people who communicate with his ask many questions. If he doesn't answer to them they don't purchase the product; quite the opposite, the passage illustrates this as a negative point of the mentioned method. Finally, as the text stated the society will be affected by buzzing adversely. Because people can't trust when they face people who are advertising and don't introduce themselves as a buzzer; moreover, they suggest not useful manufacture; however, the man refutes the idea by adding the fact that people can trust better when they see the direct conceptuses of their shopping.