There are split opinions about actions of children should be restricted. Guardians and educators have a responsibility of thriving a child. Former group of individuals support to be strict. On the other hand, latter group believes to give a freedom. Ahead of my opinion, both views must be critiqued in the ensuing paragraphs.
Discussing the former view, the supporters states that the behaviour of a growing child should be strictly controlled. As a parent and teacher, they have a pressure of growing a child properly. For an instance, several pupils have been given a freedom by their guardians, In a result, they misbehave with others, the things are been stolen by them and they don't respect their elders. Thus, parents and teachers need to be strict for making a child well mannered as well as a great person and a obedient child. A growing child is not mature enough to distinguish between good and bad, therefore, it is better for them to thrive in a strict environment.
Contradictorily, the counterparts believe that giving a freedom to children rather than restrict them is more desirable. Taking an example, a child is growing in an environment where there is no restrictions, thus, he can do all the things in his own way, moreover, overall development of that child would be always greater than the restricted one. Thereby, a child should never be pressurised by their parents or faculties. It will constrict the growth of that child. The children shall be allowed to live their life, additionally, they should have an allowance to decide satisfactory career for themselves. Lastly, for the desirable development and growth of a children, the freedom should be given by their parents and educators.
Overall, after discussing both views, each of them have several advantages and disadvantages. However, I opine that any child should be grown in a friendly environment. Thus, I go with the latter view because it is essential for their better future. 
There  
are split
 opinions about actions of  
children
 should  
be restricted
. Guardians and educators have a responsibility of thriving a  
child
. Former group of individuals support to be strict.  
On the other hand
, latter group believes to give a  
freedom
. Ahead of my opinion, both  
views
  must
  be critiqued
 in the ensuing paragraphs.
Discussing the former  
view
, the supporters states that the  
behaviour
 of a  
growing
  child
 should be  
strictly
 controlled. As a  
parent
 and teacher, they have a pressure of  
growing
 a  
child
  properly
. For an instance, several pupils have been  
given
 a  
freedom
 by their guardians, In a result, they misbehave with others, the things  
are been
 stolen by  
them and
 they don't respect their elders.  
Thus
,  
parents
 and teachers need to be strict for making a  
child
  well mannered
  as well
 as a great person and  
a
 obedient  
child
. A  
growing
  child
 is not mature  
enough
 to distinguish between  
good
 and  
bad
,  
therefore
, it is better for them to thrive in a strict environment. 
Contradictorily
, the counterparts believe that giving a  
freedom
 to  
children
  rather
 than restrict them is more desirable. Taking an example, a  
child
 is  
growing
 in an environment where  
there is no restrictions
,  
thus
, he can do all the things in his  
own
 way,  
moreover
,  
overall
 development of that  
child
 would be always greater than the restricted one. Thereby, a  
child
 should never be  
pressurised
 by their  
parents
 or faculties. It will constrict the growth of that  
child
. The  
children
 shall be  
allowed
 to  
live
 their life,  
additionally
, they should have an allowance to decide satisfactory career for themselves.  
Lastly
, for the desirable development and growth of a  
children
, the  
freedom
 should be  
given
 by their  
parents
 and educators. 
Overall
, after discussing both  
views
, each of them have several advantages and disadvantages.  
However
, I opine that any  
child
 should  
be grown
 in a friendly environment.  
Thus
, I  
go with
 the latter  
view
  because
 it is essential for their better future.