One of the debatable issues these days is the fact that everyone has various abilities and some pupils may struggle to learn international languages. It is considered that the kids should not be compelled by their schools to study foreign languages for which they do not have a natural aptitude. From my perspective, I totally agree with this viewpoint. Before sharing the conclusion of this article, the qualities of the given topic will be examined. The extreme pratfall of compelling the students who are not excellent at obtaining a new language will put them under a plethora of pressure. Since a few of the pupils are not inherent to adapt to a foreign language, therefore, being subject to do something above the ability may have a profoundly adverse impact on their psychology. They are more likely to get stressed, even depressed, or more prone to have a wide variety of mental disorders. To cite an example, Vietnam began implementing English education for the students in the remote regions for a month, however, they found it challenging and felt crestfallen to learn, especially lost the motivation in studying. As a result, the school had no choice except to terminate the teaching program of foreign languages for the pupils. It is without a doubt that few students can adapt to an international language except to their mother tongue, for that reason, the educational institution should not oblige the pupils to acquire a language that they can not master.
In addition, should the students not be capable of studying international languages, they can have gifts for other fields or subjects such as maths, literature, physics. Consequently, being forced to acquire these languages may hinder them from developing their competence. Some students may have talents in art but they are forced to learn new languages for which they hold no affinity, which may lead to the impairment of their natural skills. The International Schools Act of 1972 provides that only up to four years of English shall be compulsory. With regard to Chinese languages, instruction is not compulsory in any school of this Act. As a result, forcing students to adapt to international languages is unnecessary, especially to the ones having no ability to be receptive.
In conclusion, today there have a large number of students who are not good at studying a new language, being subject to learn may bring downward pressure to them and generate the hindrance to the improvement of other skills. Therefore, the schools should not compel the students to learn something above their abilities, namely learning a international language.
One of the debatable issues these days is the fact that everyone has various
abilities
and
some
pupils
may struggle to
learn
international
languages
. It
is considered
that the kids should not
be compelled
by their
schools
to study foreign
languages
for which they do not have a natural aptitude. From my perspective, I
totally
agree
with this viewpoint.
Before
sharing the conclusion of this article, the qualities of the
given
topic will
be examined
. The extreme pratfall of compelling the
students
who are not excellent at obtaining a new
language
will put them under a plethora of pressure. Since a few of the
pupils
are not inherent to adapt to a foreign
language
,
therefore
, being subject to do something above the
ability
may have a
profoundly
adverse impact on their psychology. They are more likely to
get
stressed
, even depressed, or more prone to have a wide variety of mental disorders. To cite an example, Vietnam began implementing English education for the
students
in the remote regions for a month,
however
, they found it challenging and felt crestfallen to
learn
,
especially
lost the motivation in studying.
As a result
, the
school
had no choice except to terminate the teaching program of foreign
languages
for the
pupils
. It is without a doubt that few
students
can adapt to an
international
language
except to their mother tongue, for that reason, the educational institution should not oblige the
pupils
to acquire a
language
that they can not master.
In addition
, should the
students
not be capable of studying
international
languages
, they can have gifts for other fields or subjects such as
maths
, literature, physics.
Consequently
,
being forced
to acquire these
languages
may hinder them from developing their competence.
Some
students
may have talents in art
but
they
are forced
to
learn
new
languages
for which they hold no affinity, which may lead to the impairment of their natural
skills
. The
International
Schools
Act of 1972 provides that
only
up to four years of English shall be compulsory. With regard to Chinese
languages
, instruction is not compulsory in any
school
of this Act.
As a result
, forcing
students
to adapt to
international
languages
is unnecessary,
especially
to the ones having no
ability
to be receptive.
In conclusion
,
today
there have
a large number of
students
who are not
good
at studying a new
language
, being subject to
learn
may bring downward pressure to them and generate the hindrance to the improvement of other
skills
.
Therefore
, the
schools
should not compel the
students
to
learn
something above their
abilities
,
namely
learning
a
international
language
.