Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Atomic energy is is becoming more and more popular energy source however some people argue that nuclear power puts life on the earth to danger what is is your opinion

Atomic energy is is becoming more and more popular energy source however some people argue that nuclear power puts life on the earth to danger what is is your opinion Jj2j

The major amount of electricity is produced by nuclear power plant consequently the use of atomic energy increases at an alarming rate. It is believed by few individuals that it is good source of energy while other oppose that nuclear power puts life on the earth to danger because it create radioactive wastage that's why I also think that it is negative development. I will shed light on both views and discuss my opinion in upcoming paragraph. To begin with the first opine of persons, who argued that fission power becoming more and more popular due to the fact that it is not much expensive because fuels used such as a plutonium, thorium, uranium and many more are much cheaper. For example, the electricity can be easily generated by using less rated uranium. Therefore the need of this rises day by day. As every coin has two sides, similarly the opposents are also here, who believed that the excess take of atomic energy mighg stick the life of mortals like animals and humans into risk owing to the fact that it leave the trashes, which are radioactive in nature and very harmful for the health of livings. Furthermore, these materials stays in the air for a lifetime, which definitely will give negative impact in a future. For instance, the workers of nuclear power plant are suffer from cancer because of these things has it puts our life in a danger. In my honest opine, the nuclear energy is not safe for living beings due to the fact that it is not renewable which is not good for environment. By considering all the facts, nuclear energy is very useful as it is cheaper and on the other hand it is bliss less for ecosystem.

The major amount of electricity is produced
 by nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 plant consequently
 the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of atomic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 increases at an alarming rate. It is believed
 by few individuals that it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 source of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 while other oppose that nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 puts life on the earth to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardrisk
danger
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 it Did you mean "creates"?creates
create
 radioactive wastage that's why I also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that it is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 development. I will shed light on both views and discuss my opinion in upcoming paragraph.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with the first
 opine of persons, who argued that fission You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 becoming more and more popular due to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcasematterlawexperienceevidence
fact
 that it is not much expensive This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 fuels This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 such as a plutonium, thorium, uranium and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 more are much cheaper. For example
, the electricity can be easily
 generated by using less rated uranium. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Therefore,
Therefore
 the need of this Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "rises'" or "rise's"?rises'rise's
rises
 day by day.

As every coin has two sides, similarly
 the Possible spelling mistake found.opponents
opposents
 are also
 here, who believed that the excess take of atomic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
Possible spelling mistake found.mightmiff
mighg
 stick the life of mortals like animals and humans into This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazarddanger
risk
 owing to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcasematterlawexperienceevidence
fact
 that it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :depart
leave
 the trashes, which are radioactive in nature and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 harmful for the health of livings. Furthermore
, these materials stays in the air for a lifetime, which definitely will give This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 impact in a future. For instance
, the workers of nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 plant are Consider using a past participle here: "suffered".suffered
suffer
 from cancer This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of these things has it puts our life in a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardrisk
danger
.

In my honest opine, the nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is not safe for living beings due to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcasematterlawexperienceevidence
fact
 that it is not renewable which is not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 for environment.

By considering all the facts, nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 useful as it is cheaper and on the other hand
 it is bliss less for ecosystem. 