As underdeveloped communities usually receive economical help from the rest of the industrialized countries; it is often argued that this could never alleviate the destitution for this underserved countries, this is why other alternatives have to be proposed to help low-income countries overcome their indigence. I strongly agree with this point of as I believe that offering technical support in vital fields and investing in the most essential sectors could have meangniful outcomes in these penurious societies.
First of all, offering financial assistance without technical support is consedirate as a waste of money. This is because, usually emergent natios need technical supports to wisely use their resources. For instance, sending experts in vital sectors such as education, health and economy, might be of a great benefit for these countries, as it will allow them to train their own human ressources, and prepare them to be the future leader who could help the countries cope with their essential problems. Therefore, it may appear that underdeveloped coutries dont lack of experts but they lack of ressources, however, it can be argued that having the expertise of specialist from leading countries is very beneficial.
Furthermore, investing huge funding in the most essential sectors in this countries, could generate significant outcomes and by result help these nations to be economically self-dependent rather than waiting always for external financial helps. For example, if investing are implemented in industry and tourism, there will be at least two major profits: firstly, it will create jobs opportunities, secondely it could help the economic growth of the country.
To summarize, to help low income countries tackle with their economical concerns, it is more beneficial to offer technical supports and invest in the vital sectors in order to train the future leaders and generate significant outcomes.
As underdeveloped communities
usually
receive economical
help
from the rest of the industrialized
countries
; it is
often
argued that this could never alleviate the destitution for this underserved
countries
, this is why other alternatives
have to
be proposed
to
help
low-income
countries
overcome their indigence. I
strongly
agree
with this point of as I believe that offering
technical
support
in vital fields and investing in the most essential
sectors
could have
meangniful
outcomes in these penurious societies.
First of all
, offering financial assistance without
technical
support
is
consedirate
as a waste of money. This is
because
,
usually
emergent
natios
need
technical
supports
to
wisely
use
their resources.
For instance
, sending experts in vital
sectors
such as education, health and economy, might be of a great benefit for these
countries
, as it will
allow
them to train their
own
human
ressources
, and prepare them to be the future leader who could
help
the
countries
cope with their essential problems.
Therefore
, it may appear that underdeveloped
coutries
dont
lack of experts
but
they lack of
ressources
,
however
, it can
be argued
that having the expertise of specialist from leading
countries
is
very
beneficial.
Furthermore
, investing huge funding in the most essential
sectors
in
this
countries
, could generate significant outcomes and by result
help
these nations to be
economically
self-dependent
rather
than waiting always for external financial
helps
.
For example
, if investing
are implemented
in industry and tourism, there will be at least two major profits:
firstly
, it will create jobs opportunities,
secondely
it could
help
the economic growth of the country.
To summarize
, to
help
low income
countries
tackle with their economical concerns, it is more beneficial to offer
technical
supports
and invest in the vital
sectors
in order to train the future leaders and generate significant outcomes.