There is a heated controversy whether more money allocated for road system is paid by the goverment or the user. While some people think that car ownerships should cover the costs, I consider that this costs should be paid by the authorities.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons for inhabitants why they allocate money for road system. First, it is obvious that wider and more easy-going roads built to suitable for needs of citizens. As a result, that users should cover the costs of construction. Second, paying for road systems discourages car ownership to use private cars, so, lead to protect the environment. If inhabitants want to save your travelling fee, they would frequently use the public transports, such as: buses. . . . This reduces environmental damage by reduce the car emmisions.
On the other hand, I believe that authorities should invest in transportation. It is truth that maintaining road systems to be safe for users is a part of the state’s responsibility. However, national budget is from citizen’s tax, it should be served for their benefit. Furthermore, construction and improvement of road systems requires a tremendous amount of money, which is much higher than citizens’ financial. For example, a highway building project need cost billions of dollar, so, it is only governments that have enough power to share the financial aid from global community. . In addition, the profits from the users's money that the state can allocate more resources to improving health care system, education system, . . .
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some right scores, it seems to me that it is better for road systems to be maintained and erected by each authority.
There is a heated controversy whether more
money
allocated for
road
system
is paid
by the
goverment
or the user. While
some
people
think
that
car
ownerships
should cover the
costs
, I consider that
this
costs
should
be paid
by the authorities.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons for inhabitants why they allocate
money
for
road
system
.
First
, it is obvious that wider and more easy-going
roads
built to suitable for needs of citizens.
As a result
, that users should cover the
costs
of construction. Second, paying for
road
systems
discourages
car
ownership to
use
private
cars
,
so
, lead to protect the environment. If inhabitants want to save your travelling fee, they would
frequently
use
the public transports, such as: buses.
.
.
.
This
reduces
environmental damage by
reduce
the
car
emmisions
.
On the other hand
, I believe that authorities should invest in transportation. It is truth that maintaining
road
systems
to be safe for users is a part of the state’s responsibility.
However
, national budget is from citizen’s tax, it should
be served
for their benefit.
Furthermore
, construction and improvement of
road
systems
requires a tremendous amount of
money
, which is much higher than citizens’ financial.
For example
, a highway building project need
cost
billions of dollar,
so
, it is
only
governments
that have
enough
power to share the financial aid from global community.
.
In addition
, the profits from the
users's
money
that the state can allocate more resources to improving health care
system
, education
system
, .
.
.
In conclusion
, although both views
certainly
have
some
right scores, it seems to me that it is better for
road
systems
to
be maintained
and erected by each authority.