There is a heated controversy whether more money allocated for road system is paid by the goverment or the user. While some people think that car ownerships should cover the costs, I consider that this costs should be paid by the authorities.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons for inhabitants why they allocate money for road system. First, it is obvious that wider and more easy-going roads built to suitable for needs of citizens. As a result, that users should cover the costs of construction. Second, paying for road systems discourages car ownership to use private cars, so, lead to protect the environment. If inhabitants want to save your travelling fee, they would frequently use the public transports, such as: buses. . . . This reduces environmental damage by reduce the car emmisions.
On the other hand, I believe that authorities should invest in transportation. It is truth that maintaining road systems to be safe for users is a part of the state’s responsibility. However, national budget is from citizen’s tax, it should be served for their benefit. Furthermore, construction and improvement of road systems requires a tremendous amount of money, which is much higher than citizens’ financial. For example, a highway building project need cost billions of dollar, so, it is only governments that have enough power to share the financial aid from global community. . In addition, the profits from the users's money that the state can allocate more resources to improving health care system, education system, . . .
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some right scores, it seems to me that it is better for road systems to be maintained and erected by each authority. 
There is a heated controversy whether more  
money
 allocated for  
road
  system
  is paid
 by the  
goverment
 or the user. While  
some
  people
  think
 that  
car
  ownerships
 should cover the  
costs
, I consider that  
this
  costs
 should  
be paid
 by the authorities.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons for inhabitants why they allocate  
money
 for  
road
  system
.  
First
, it is obvious that wider and more easy-going  
roads
 built to suitable for needs of citizens.  
As a result
, that users should cover the  
costs
 of construction. Second, paying for  
road
  systems
 discourages  
car
 ownership to  
use
 private  
cars
,  
so
, lead to protect the environment. If inhabitants want to save your travelling fee, they would  
frequently
  use
 the public transports, such as: buses.  
.
  .
  .
 This  
reduces
 environmental damage by  
reduce
 the  
car
  emmisions
. 
On the other hand
, I believe that authorities should invest in transportation. It is truth that maintaining  
road
  systems
 to be safe for users is a part of the state’s responsibility.  
However
, national budget is from citizen’s tax, it should  
be served
 for their benefit.  
Furthermore
, construction and improvement of  
road
  systems
 requires a tremendous amount of  
money
, which is much higher than citizens’ financial.  
For example
, a highway building project need  
cost
 billions of dollar,  
so
, it is  
only
  governments
 that have  
enough
 power to share the financial aid from global community.  
.
  In addition
, the profits from the  
users's
  money
 that the state can allocate more resources to improving health care  
system
, education  
system
 , .
  .
  .
 In conclusion
, although both views  
certainly
 have  
some
 right scores, it seems to me that it is better for  
road
  systems
 to  
be maintained
 and erected by each authority.