Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

As public safety is of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer from for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. with this statement? v. 1

The testing of new products on animals is controversial. Some people claim that in view of public safety, it is essential to test these new products on animals. These people also feel that instead of putting human life at risk, it is better for a few animals suffer by untested products. I completely agree with this statement. Firstly, few animals has the same genetic configuration as that of humans. Hence their manifestations are similar to the humans. For instance, injection insulin is a life saving drug for diabetics. It was released to the public, only after testing on animals for immediate and delayed manifestations. Perhaps, millions of people would have succumbed to diabetes, if this life saving drug was not tested on animals. Therefore, to attain utmost safety for millions of people any new drug or product must ensure adequate testing on animals, which are genetically similar to human genome. Secondly, humans are allergic to certain chemicals and they are prone to anaphylactic shock, which can cause death instantly. For example, certain untested perfumes or deodorants can result in severe life threatening allergic reactions. Moreover, if some animals are sacrificed while testing, it has indirectly saved lives of thousands of people. Because, such products will not be released into the market. Overall, humans can be at risk, if they are using products, which are not tested adequately. In conclusion, many human lives can be protected, if the new products undergo prior adequate animal testing. Finally, harming few animals is better than risking the human life.

IELTS essay As public safety is of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer from for human life to be placed at risk by untested products. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? v.1

The testing of new products on animals is controversial.
Some
people
claim that in view of public safety, it is essential to
test
these new products on animals. These
people
also
feel that
instead
of putting human life at
risk
, it is better for a few animals suffer by untested products. I completely
agree
with this statement.
Firstly
, few animals has the same genetic configuration as that of humans.
Hence
their manifestations are similar to the humans.
For instance
, injection insulin is a life saving drug for diabetics. It
was released
to the public,
only
after testing on animals for immediate and delayed manifestations. Perhaps, millions of
people
would have succumbed to diabetes, if this life saving drug was not
tested
on animals.
Therefore
, to attain utmost safety for millions of
people
any new drug or product
must
ensure adequate testing on animals, which are
genetically
similar to human genome.
Secondly
, humans are allergic to certain
chemicals and
they are prone to anaphylactic shock, which can cause death
instantly
.
For example
, certain untested perfumes or deodorants can result in severe life threatening allergic reactions.
Moreover
, if
some
animals
are sacrificed
while testing, it has
indirectly
saved
lives
of thousands of
people
.
Because
, such products will not
be released
into the market.
Overall
, humans can be at
risk
, if they are using products, which are not
tested
adequately
.
In conclusion
,
many
human
lives
can
be protected
, if the new products undergo prior adequate animal testing.
Finally
, harming few animals is better than risking the human life.
13Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
50Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes
4 paragraphs
255 words
9
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resources: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Band score ≥ 7
  • Band score ≤ 6
Similar essay posts: