Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life? Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life? gkBD

The topic of privacy for celebrities is still widely debated nowadays. Some people claiming that famous people should sacrifice their privacy to earn attention and profits, while others disagree with it. There are valid opinions on both sides, which I will consider now. On the one hand, the supporters of the media highlighted that being exposed to the public is part of the celebrity's job. It is often said that the famous should get used to the high exposure rate to the public, which includes their personal life. What's more, they also said that consistent reports from media can greatly shape the behaviours of the famous. For example, if a celebrity expects that his private life will be recorded or reported by the media, then there is a higher chance for him to behave in order. Conversely, if the media does not report the private life, the public would not know if the celebrity is drug addicted or involves in other grey areas. On the other hand, the advocates of more personal space to the famous highlighted that they should be treated as human beings. In other words, the media should treat everyone fairly regardless of occupation, gender, or race. Furthermore, the famous are bearing much more burdens and pressures than we think. Sometimes they get depressed or commit suicide because the cyber-bullying and the negative comments on the internet. For example, there were more than 10 Korean popstars decided to end their life at such young ages in a range of 20 to 30. No matter what they do, even a smell can attract thousands of negative comments that attack them. Finally, the media should give the famous a break from cameras, they should feel comfortable wearing cozy clothes and go out without makeups. Overall, I feel that the media should give the famous more privacy because the negative effects on the mental and physical health of the famous are significant and require immediate actions.

The topic of privacy for celebrities is still
widely
 debated nowadays. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 claiming that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhonoredpreeminentremarkableoutstandingpowerfulwell-known
famous
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 should sacrifice their privacy to earn attention and profits, while others disagree with it. There are valid opinions on both sides, which I will consider This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
.

On the one hand, the supporters of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
 highlighted that being exposed
 to the public is part of the celebrity's job. It is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:frequently
often
 said that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhonoredpreeminentremarkableoutstandingpowerfulwell-known
famous
 should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to the high exposure rate to the public, which includes their personal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
. What's more, they also
 said that consistent reports from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
 can greatly
 shape the Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviours' is British English.behaviors
behaviours
 of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhonoredpreeminentremarkableoutstandingpowerfulwell-known
famous
. For example
, if a celebrity This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :anticipates
expects
 that his private You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
 will be recorded
 or reported by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
, then there is a higher chance for him to behave in order. Conversely
, if the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
 does not report the private You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
, the public would not know if the celebrity is drug addicted or involves in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
Possible spelling mistake. 'grey' is British English.gray
grey
 areas.

On the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 hand, the advocates of more personal space to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhonoredpreeminentremarkableoutstandingpowerfulwell-known
famous
 highlighted that they should be treated
 as human beings. In You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 words, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
 should treat everyone fairly
 regardless of occupation, gender, or race. Furthermore
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhonoredpreeminentremarkableoutstandingpowerfulwell-known
famous
 are bearing much more burdens and pressures than we This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :in some instances
Sometimes
 they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 depressed or commit suicide This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the cyber-bullying and the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 comments on the internet. For example
, there were more than 10 Korean Possible spelling mistake found.pop starspops tars
popstars
 decided to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 their Did you mean "lives"?lives
life
 at such young ages in a range of 20 to 30. No matter what they do, even a smell can attract thousands of This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 comments that attack them. Finally
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
 should give the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhonoredpreeminentremarkableoutstandingpowerfulwell-known
famous
 a break from cameras, they should feel comfortable wearing cozy clothes and go out without makeups.

Overall
, I feel that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
 should give the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhonoredpreeminentremarkableoutstandingpowerfulwell-known
famous
 more privacy This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 effects on the mental and physical health of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhonoredpreeminentremarkableoutstandingpowerfulwell-known
famous
 are significant and require immediate actions. 