A highly debatable issue today is related to the experimentation of animals that are domestic and wild. These days, the majority of people claim that during the experience using on animals is not food way which any reason. Others think that numerous researches show that in terms of medical advances do experiments on animals are profitable.
I am going to discuss both sides of this argument the give my perspective on the matter.
On one side of the argument, some people argue that making experiments on animals is considered a big danger for their life. It is clear that at present the number of experiments is becoming more. If one experiment requires an animal, in the future thousands of animals will be experimented year by year. The sorts of animals are limited in nature. Some kinds of tests show a negative impact on animals. Before happening such kinds of isitsituations animalsuld be protected by the governments.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that could be experimented with medical advances. In a world in which global warming is causing big problems, a lot of diseases are appearing and spreading very quickly. Such positions depend on experiences over the animals. Plenty of vaccinations is very dangerous for human life. That is why sciences opt to test them on cattle. Cattles are considered durable for this period. Furthermore, without testing, we can face many animals that have been lost according to urgent reasons in different places all over the world. Thus, nations could provide experiments on animals for medical improvement.
In conclusion, I believe both sides have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that animals should be experimented with for researching and developing medicine
A
highly
debatable issue
today
is related
to the experimentation of
animals
that are domestic and wild. These days, the majority of
people
claim that during the experience using on
animals
is not food way which any reason. Others
think
that numerous researches
show
that in terms of medical advances do
experiments
on
animals
are profitable.
I am going to discuss both sides of this argument the give my perspective on the matter.
On one side of the argument,
some
people
argue that making
experiments
on
animals
is considered
a
big
danger
for their life. It is
clear
that at present the number of
experiments
is becoming more. If one
experiment
requires an
animal
, in the future thousands of
animals
will
be experimented
year by year. The sorts of
animals
are limited
in nature.
Some
kinds of
tests
show
a
negative
impact on
animals
.
Before
happening such kinds of
isitsituations
animalsuld
be protected
by the
governments
.
On the other hand
, it is
also
possible to
make
the opposing case. It is
often
argued that could
be experimented
with medical advances. In a world in which global warming is causing
big
problems,
a lot of
diseases
are appearing
and spreading
very
quickly
. Such positions depend on experiences over the
animals
.
Plenty
of vaccinations is
very
dangerous
for human life.
That is
why sciences opt to
test
them on cattle.
Cattles
are considered
durable for this period.
Furthermore
, without testing, we can face
many
animals
that have
been lost
according to urgent reasons in
different
places all over the world.
Thus
, nations could provide
experiments
on
animals
for medical improvement.
In conclusion
, I believe both sides have their merits. On balance,
however
, I feel that
animals
should
be experimented
with for researching and developing
medicine