Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Animals used for experimental results are they good or bad discuss both views

Animals used for experimental results are they good or bad discuss both views X72bA
A highly debatable issue today is related to the experimentation of animals that are domestic and wild. These days, the majority of people claim that during the experience using on animals is not food way which any reason. Others think that numerous researches show that in terms of medical advances do experiments on animals are profitable. I am going to discuss both sides of this argument the give my perspective on the matter. On one side of the argument, some people argue that making experiments on animals is considered a big danger for their life. It is clear that at present the number of experiments is becoming more. If one experiment requires an animal, in the future thousands of animals will be experimented year by year. The sorts of animals are limited in nature. Some kinds of tests show a negative impact on animals. Before happening such kinds of isitsituations animalsuld be protected by the governments. On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that could be experimented with medical advances. In a world in which global warming is causing big problems, a lot of diseases are appearing and spreading very quickly. Such positions depend on experiences over the animals. Plenty of vaccinations is very dangerous for human life. That is why sciences opt to test them on cattle. Cattles are considered durable for this period. Furthermore, without testing, we can face many animals that have been lost according to urgent reasons in different places all over the world. Thus, nations could provide experiments on animals for medical improvement. In conclusion, I believe both sides have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that animals should be experimented with for researching and developing medicine
A
highly
debatable issue
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
is related
to the experimentation of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
that are domestic and wild. These days, the majority of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
claim that during the experience using on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
is not food way which any reason. Others
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that numerous researches
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
that in terms of medical advances do
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are profitable.

I am going to discuss both sides of this argument the give my perspective on the matter.

On one side of the argument,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
argue that making
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
is considered
a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
danger
for their life. It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that at present the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
is becoming more. If one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiment
requires an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
, in the future thousands of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
will
be experimented
year by year. The sorts of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are limited
in nature.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
kinds of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
impact on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
“Before” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Before
happening such kinds of
Possible spelling mistake found.
isitsituations
Possible spelling mistake found.
animalsuld
be protected
by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
.

On the other hand
, it is
also
possible to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the opposing case. It is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
argued that could
be experimented
with medical advances. In a world in which global warming is causing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
problems,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
diseases
The verb 'appearing' is a stative verb and sometimes the progressive form is not correct. Try a simple form instead.
are appearing
and spreading
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
quickly
. Such positions depend on experiences over the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Plenty
of vaccinations is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
dangerous
for human life.
That is
why sciences opt to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
them on cattle.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Cattles
are considered
durable for this period.
Furthermore
, without testing, we can face
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
that have
been lost
according to urgent reasons in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
places all over the world.
Thus
, nations could provide
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for medical improvement.

In conclusion
, I believe both sides have their merits. On balance,
however
, I feel that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should
be experimented
with for researching and developing
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
medicine

IELTS essay Animals used for experimental results are they good or bad discuss both views

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
292 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Animals used for experimental results are they good or bad discuss both views