Based on a common idea, there are no justifiable reasons that humans should make an effort to halt the demise of wildlife as the extermination of certain animals is an inevitable part of natural selection throughout history. My disagreement with this assertion will be outlined in the upcoming paragraphs.
The extinction pace of wildlife has been rapidly increased compared with the expected natural rate in history largely due to human interference. To be more specific, in the natural living cycle, each creature has a specified span of existence which will guarantee the continuity of life on the planet earth, nevertheless, countless mankind's intervention such ad the rampant poaching has led to the disruption of the ecosystem in the recent decades. Consequently, the disappearance of one single plant or species not only would compromise the function of other organisms that mutually interact with it but also will have a fatal impact on the human race in terms of disturbing the whole food chain. For instance, if the number of bees or birds reduces, the process of pollination which has a pivotal role in the growth of the crops will be significantly affected, resulting in the lack of fruits and vegetables.
Additionally, the ecological imbalance and termination of wildlife would have a negative influence on medical achievements. Since many medicines such as aspirin and penicillin have been derived from a variety of plants and animals, the loss of natural habitats has resulted in weak biodiversity that could lead to eliminating the chance of finding proper cures to deadly diseases namely cancer and Parkinson's. Hence, the more species are exposed to wiped out, the more challenging situations would occur to the human being in many ways
In sum, the natural process of extinction that in the past was accompanied to have a sufficient time to recovery has been accelerated in the past few years which is mainly attributed to human activities. Each individual has an undeniable obligation to preserve the living species.
Based on a common
idea
, there are no justifiable reasons that
humans
should
make
an effort to halt the demise of wildlife as the extermination of certain animals is an inevitable part of
natural
selection throughout history. My disagreement with this assertion will
be outlined
in the upcoming paragraphs.
The extinction pace of wildlife has been
rapidly
increased compared with the
expected
natural
rate in history
largely
due to
human
interference. To be more specific, in the
natural
living cycle, each creature has a specified span of existence which will guarantee the continuity of life on the planet earth,
nevertheless
, countless mankind's intervention such ad the rampant poaching has led to the disruption of the ecosystem in the recent decades.
Consequently
, the disappearance of one single plant or species not
only
would compromise the function of other organisms that
mutually
interact with it
but
also
will have a fatal impact on the
human
race in terms of disturbing the whole food chain.
For instance
, if the number of bees or birds
reduces
, the process of pollination which has a pivotal role in the growth of the crops will be
significantly
affected
, resulting in the lack of fruits and vegetables.
Additionally
, the ecological imbalance and termination of wildlife would have a
negative
influence on medical achievements. Since
many
medicines such as aspirin and penicillin have
been derived
from a variety of plants and animals, the loss of
natural
habitats has resulted in weak biodiversity that could lead to eliminating the chance of finding proper cures to deadly diseases
namely
cancer and Parkinson's.
Hence
, the more species
are exposed
to wiped out, the more challenging situations would occur to the
human
being in
many
ways
In sum, the
natural
process of extinction that in the past
was accompanied
to have a sufficient time to recovery has
been accelerated
in the past few years which is
mainly
attributed to
human
activities. Each individual has an undeniable obligation to preserve the living species.