Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

"We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more stu

" We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more stu kYjon
Though the survey carried out among the students of grove college and almunae can be a strong reason to maintain the trend of all-female education, a deeper look into the methodology applied for the survey and conclusion drawn from them can reveal a pretty different picture. Firstly, as mentioned in the argument almunae are one of the major supporter of college and as the almunae member have opposed the idea of co-education, it seems plausible to maintain trend to maintain support from them. However, the study doesn't mention the criteria about how the respondents were chosen from the almunae for the survey. If the respondents of the survey, for instance, happen to be the one who never made contribution to college, and the other half who didn't even participate in the survey were the major supporter then it wouldn't be sound to draw conclusion based on this survey. Similarly, the argument also mentions the results of survey among the college students where 80% of them wanted to maintain the trend of all-female education. However, the argument mentions nowhere if the respondents of the survey were inclusive (including juniors and seniors equally). Had the survey been conducted only among the junior or only among the seniors then survey itself wont be reliable, let alone the conclusion drawn from it. In the same way the argument also mentions in its concluding part that the moral of the students will improve if it maintains the status quo. But, it doesn't make it clear how maintaining the same situation as of now would improve the moral of students. Rather as the faculty supports the idea of co-education, not acting according to their line of thought might dwindle their morale instead, that may affect the morale of students indirectly. Therefore, though from bird's-eye view the idea of maintaining all-female education seems plausible, a deeper look into the facts and studies that are mentioned to bolster the argument might reveal a completely different picture. So, it is mandatory to re-evaluate those facts and studies and then only move forward to make a decision.
Though the
survey
carried out among the
students
of grove college and
almunae
can be a strong reason to
maintain
the trend of all-female education, a deeper look into the methodology applied for the
survey
and conclusion drawn from them can reveal a pretty
different
picture.

Firstly
, as mentioned in the
argument
almunae
are one of the major supporter of college and as the
almunae
member have opposed the
idea
of co-education, it seems plausible to
maintain
trend to
maintain
support from them.
However
, the study doesn't
mention
the criteria about how the respondents
were chosen
from the
almunae
for the
survey
. If the respondents of the
survey
,
for instance
, happen to be the one who never made contribution to college, and the other half who didn't even participate in the
survey
were the major supporter then it wouldn't be sound to draw conclusion based on this survey.

Similarly
, the
argument
also
mentions
the results of
survey
among the college
students
where 80% of them wanted to
maintain
the trend of all-female education.
However
, the
argument
mentions
nowhere if the respondents of the
survey
were inclusive (including juniors and seniors
equally
). Had the
survey
been conducted
only
among the junior or
only
among the seniors then
survey
itself
wont
be reliable,
let
alone the conclusion drawn from it.

In the same way
the
argument
also
mentions
in its concluding part that the
moral
of the
students
will
improve
if it
maintains
the status quo.
But
, it doesn't
make
it
clear
how maintaining the same situation as of
now
would
improve
the
moral
of
students
.
Rather
as the faculty supports the
idea
of co-education, not acting according to their line of
thought
might dwindle their
morale
instead
, that may affect the
morale
of
students
indirectly
.

Therefore
, though from bird's-eye view the
idea
of maintaining all-female education seems plausible, a deeper look into the facts and studies that
are mentioned
to bolster the
argument
might reveal a completely
different
picture.
So
, it is mandatory to re-evaluate those facts and studies and then
only
move
forward to
make
a decision.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad
Show Comments
If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his own language, that goes to his heart.
Nelson Mandela

IELTS essay " We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more stu

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
347 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts