The reading and the lecture are both about the alternative strategies to combat the malaria disease. The author of the article presents three main points about the elimination of the disease. The lecture of refutes the claims made in the article. His position is that unfortunately treatment of malaria is very difficult to eradicate because ancient drugs can treat malarial not cure. Moreover, these parasites are now resistance to most of the drugs.
First, the writer claims that patients can be treated with effective medicines. Furthermore, it is stated in the article that before treatment strain of the parasite should be identified and accordingly durgs should be administered for effective treatment of the patient. In contrast, the lecturer argues that which drug should be used for particular malarial strain it is very difficult because most of the strains are resistance to the drugs and differen reagion has different type of strains and it is difficult to treat the malarial parasite with this strategy.
Second, the author mentions that killing parasite using chemical spray will be effective agains the parasite. On top of that, he adds that releasing the fish into the water to pray the parasite or larva will be effective against the parasite. However, the lecturer calls this arguement in to question by saying that chemicla spray will not kill the malarial because mosquitoe adult will fly away from the chemical spray. Further, he remarks that in the same ways fish cannot kill the mosquitoes, even they will fly away.
Finally, the author assests that using the radiation method mosquitoes can be sterile. In addtion to that author, in the article it is mentioned that if sterile mosuitoes mate with fertile female they will produce egg which will not hatch. As opposed to the author, the lecturer holds that It may be useful technique but it will be harmless for parasite sterile mosquitoes may be unattractive to mate
The reading and the lecture are both about the alternative strategies to combat the malaria disease. The
author
of the
article
presents three main points about the elimination of the disease.
The
lecture of refutes the claims made in the
article
. His position is that unfortunately treatment of malaria is
very
difficult to eradicate
because
ancient drugs can treat malarial not cure.
Moreover
, these parasites are
now
resistance to most of the drugs.
First
, the writer claims that patients can
be treated
with
effective
medicines.
Furthermore
, it
is stated
in the
article
that
before
treatment
strain
of the parasite should
be identified
and
accordingly
durgs
should
be administered
for
effective
treatment of the patient.
In contrast
, the lecturer argues that which drug should be
used
for particular malarial
strain
it is
very
difficult
because
most of the
strains
are resistance to the drugs and
differen
reagion
has
different
type of
strains
and it is difficult to treat the malarial parasite with this strategy.
Second, the
author
mentions that killing parasite using chemical spray will be
effective
agains
the parasite.
On top of that
, he
adds
that releasing the fish into the water to pray the parasite or larva will be
effective
against the parasite.
However
, the lecturer calls this
arguement
in to question by saying that
chemicla
spray will not kill the malarial
because
mosquitoe
adult will
fly
away from the chemical spray.
Further
, he remarks that in the same ways fish cannot kill the
mosquitoes
, even they will
fly
away.
Finally
, the
author
assests
that using the radiation method
mosquitoes
can be sterile. In
addtion
to that
author
, in the
article
it
is mentioned
that if sterile
mosuitoes
mate with fertile female they will produce egg which will not hatch. As opposed to the
author
, the lecturer holds that It may be useful technique
but
it will be harmless for parasite sterile
mosquitoes
may be unattractive to
mate