Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. j6ly

India is highly populated country and in modern era, we witnessed number of private vehicles got increased. I agree that, electric cars should replace all cars that burn fossil fuels. According to my opinion, Electric cars are more effective and far more efficient than petrol/diesel cars. Here firstly, I would like to highlight that electric cars are environment friendly. However, fossil fuels cars are producing toxic gases which are detrimental for health. These harmful substances are not not only harmful for human bodies moreover for animals and plants also. We witnessed, lots of health diseases in past couples of year's in which Asthma, hearts and lungs diseases are common. Numerous dangerous elements and gases are adding into oxygen due to that human life is questionable. To overcome and control this issue, Individuals and families are using air purifier's. It is quite implausible for middle class and poor person to buy such high end gadgets. Petrol and diesel vehicle manufacturing industries are also equally responsible for this unfriendly environment directly or indirectly. According to the recent survey done by one of the leading newspaper found that 70% of mortality rate got increase by air pollution. Electric cars are faster and much comfortable in respective of fossil fuel vehicles. They are more time saving and less expensive than fossil fuel cars. we can travel smoothly from one place to another without traffic congestion. For Instance, all developed and developing countries are focusing on using electric vehicles. Lots of industries set up is done and huge investment already incurred by United States. China, United States and Japan already introduced electric vehicles and enjoying a benefits out of it. Foreign countries are continuously doing inventions to promote electric vehicles and exempting taxes to concern industries due to that civic life is getting improved. In Conclusion, I believe electric vehicles are more human and environment friendly because its distinct features are dwindling pollution and providing comfy experience.

India is highly
 populated country and in modern era, we witnessed number of private You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvancarbustruckautomobile
vehicles
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquired
got
 increased. I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 that, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmagneticelectrical
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 should replace all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 that burn You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
 fuels.

According to my opinion, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmagneticelectrical
Electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 are more effective and far more efficient than petrol/diesel You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
. Here firstly
, I would like to highlight that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmagneticelectrical
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 are environment friendly. However
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
 fuels You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 are producing toxic gases which are detrimental for health. These harmful substances are Double negatives are discouraged in standard English. Can you reformulate this phrase or is a comma missing?
not not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 harmful for human bodies moreover
 for animals and plants also
. We witnessed, lots of health diseases in past couples of year's in which Asthma, hearts and lungs diseases are common. Numerous This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 elements and gases are adding into oxygen due to that human life is questionable. To overcome and control this issue, Individuals and families are using air purifier's. It is quite implausible for middle This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :coursetraining
class
 and poor person to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 such high This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 gadgets. Petrol and diesel You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvancarbustruckautomobile
vehicle
 manufacturing industries are also
equally
 responsible for this unfriendly
 environment directly
 or indirectly
. According to the recent survey done by one of the leading newspaper found that 70% of mortality rate This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquired
got
 increase by air pollution.

Electric You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 are faster and much comfortable in respective of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
 fuel You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvancarbustruckautomobile
vehicles
. They are more time saving and less expensive than You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
 fuel You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterWe
we
 can travel smoothly
 from one place to another without traffic congestion. For Instance
, all developed and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :Third World countrieslow-income countries
developing countries
 are focusing on using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmagneticelectrical
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvancarbustruckautomobile
vehicles
. Lots of industries set up is done
 and huge investment already incurred A determiner is probably missing here: "by the United States".by the United States
by United States
. China, United States and Japan already introduced You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmagneticelectrical
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvancarbustruckautomobile
vehicles
 and enjoying a benefits out of it. Foreign countries are continuously
 doing inventions to promote You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmagneticelectrical
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvancarbustruckautomobile
vehicles
 and exempting taxes to concern industries due to that civic life is getting This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorated
improved
.

In Conclusion
, I believe You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmagneticelectrical
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvancarbustruckautomobile
vehicles
 are more human and environment friendly This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 its distinct features are dwindling pollution and providing comfy experience. 