Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Aircraft uses more fuel than cars and produces pollution. Some people suggest that non essential use of aircraft like international travel should be discouraged. Do you agree or disagree?

Aircraft uses more fuel than cars and produces pollution. Some people suggest that non essential use of aircraft like international travel should be discouraged. p1O00

Diespite the arguments for less use of aircraft in the non-emergency times. I tend to think in the reverse manner and strongly disagree to the statement. My opinion is reasoned out and supports that even the non-essential usages can be continued uninterruptedly. The first argument I would bring forth is that with the advent of science and technology, research much more be aggravated and focused on replacing the white kerosene used in air planes by other non polluting or low CO2 emitting fuels. This would prove a better option than discouraging international travel. The other disadvantage of restricting non essential usage is its harming effect on the economic progress. If international tourism declines, there would be a remarkable setback in the revenue influx of a control and also the process of globalization may retard. In fact, as a solution, I suggest curing use of charter planes and privately owned jets. However, some people may counter argue that it would be beneficial to restric non-essential use. This would not only bring develop and attract people in domestic tourism by employing solutions to develop other modes of transportation. All in all, to sum up the argument in can be commented that the non essential use of aircraft apparently helps in trade and commerce in and between the countries. Other solution can help in the issue of fuel consumption and pollution. I believe that aviation, in recent times, is definitely a necessity rather than a luxury.

Possible spelling mistake found.DespiteDie spite
Diespite
 the arguments for less This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of aircraft in the non-emergency times. I tend to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 in the reverse manner and strongly
 disagree to the statement. My opinion is reasoned
 out and supports that even the non-essential usages can be continued
uninterruptedly
.

The first
 argument I would bring forth is that with the advent of science and technology, research much more be aggravated
 and focused on replacing the white kerosene This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 in air This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:aircrafts
planes
 by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
This expression is normally spelled as one or with hyphen.non-pollutingnonpolluting
non polluting
 or low CO2 emitting fuels. This would prove a better option than discouraging international travel.

The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 disadvantage of restricting It appears that a hyphen is missing.non-essential
non essential
 usage is its harming effect on the economic progress. If international tourism declines, there would be a remarkable setback in the revenue influx of a control and also
 the process of globalization may retard. In fact, as a solution, I suggest curing This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of charter This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:aircrafts
planes
 and privately
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possessed
owned
 jets.

However
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 may counter argue that it would be beneficial to Possible spelling mistake found.restrict
restric
 non-essential This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
. This would not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 bring develop and attract This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in domestic tourism by employing solutions to develop You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 modes of transportation.

All in all, to sum up the argument in can be commented
 that the It appears that a hyphen is missing.non-essential
non essential
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of aircraft apparently
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assists
helps
 in trade and commerce in and between the countries. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
Other
 solution can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 in the issue of fuel consumption and pollution. I believe that aviation, in recent times, is definitely a necessity rather
 than a luxury. 