The article states that employees with paid sick leave are less engaged in work-related accident than employees without it. The argument for this position is based on a study made by the Center of Diseases Control which shows the percentage of employees included in work accident. While this argument seems convincing on first glance, there are significant underlying flaws that raise doubt about the article conclusion.
One piece of evidence provided is that employees with unpaid sick leave feel pressured to work during time of illness. However, there are some potential problems with relying on this information. It is reasonable to believe that it exists employees who do not receive paid sick leave do not mind working under this condition. Moreover, it is acceptable they need to work so that they afford their families or they like that sort of work. Also, time of illness is not clear. Even if there is a time when a virus comes and start affecting the employees, it is reasonable to accept it might not affect everybody. It may affect just whose receive paid sick leave. However, It is unlikely to believe that there is a time of illness.
Likewise, the evidence that job accidents are spurred by impaired judgment or motor-skills due to illness or illness-related medications is ambiguous. First, it does not necessarily mean that any disease is related to job. It might have started at home, for example cold, and it got worst later. Second, if it is related to medications, obviously it is not related to the job. Furthermore, it would be worth if the employee had been to the doctor and had taken the doctor’s receipt to show to the boss.
Finally, the article states that the highest occupation showed the highest discrepancy between with and without paid leave. However, this evidence is not convinced because there is no the highest-risk occupation. In any work, every sort of occupations are the highest-risk. For example, in the construction, an employee may fall from the building or elevator. Similarly, an employee which work is driving either a car or a motorcycle may be involved in an motorcycle accident.
Owing to the above reasons, it is not a strong conclusion to make. If the article were to provide greater evidence regarding the pressure felt by the employees with unpaid sick leave, the job accidents spurred by impaired judgment or motor-skills, and the highest discrepancy showed by the highest occupation, the argument would be more convincing.
The
article
states that
employees
with
paid
sick
leave
are less engaged in work-related
accident
than
employees
without it. The argument for this position
is based
on a study made by the Center of Diseases Control which
shows
the percentage of
employees
included in
work
accident
. While this argument seems convincing
on
first
glance, there are significant underlying flaws that raise doubt about the
article
conclusion.
One piece of
evidence
provided is that
employees
with unpaid sick
leave
feel pressured to
work
during
time
of illness.
However
, there are
some
potential problems with relying on this information. It is reasonable to believe that it exists
employees
who do not receive
paid
sick
leave
do not mind working under this condition.
Moreover
, it is acceptable they need to
work
so
that they afford their
families or
they like that sort of
work
.
Also
,
time
of illness is not
clear
. Even if there is a
time
when a virus
comes
and
start
affecting the
employees
, it is reasonable to accept it might not affect everybody. It may
affect
just
whose receive
paid
sick
leave
.
However
, It is unlikely to believe that there is a
time
of illness.
Likewise
, the
evidence
that
job
accidents
are spurred
by impaired judgment or motor-
skills
due to illness or illness-related medications is ambiguous.
First
, it does not
necessarily
mean that any disease
is related
to
job
. It might have
started
at home,
for example
cold
, and it
got
worst
later. Second, if it
is related
to medications,
obviously
it is not related to the
job
.
Furthermore
, it would be worth if the
employee
had been to the doctor and had taken the doctor’s receipt to
show
to the boss.
Finally
, the
article
states that the highest
occupation
showed
the highest discrepancy between with and without
paid
leave
.
However
, this
evidence
is not convinced
because
there is
no
the highest-
risk
occupation
. In any
work
, every sort of
occupations
are
the highest-
risk
.
For example
, in the construction, an
employee
may fall from the building or elevator.
Similarly
, an
employee
which
work
is driving either a car or a motorcycle may
be involved
in
an
motorcycle accident.
Owing to the above reasons, it is not a strong conclusion to
make
. If the
article
were to provide greater
evidence
regarding the pressure felt by the
employees
with unpaid sick
leave
, the
job
accidents
spurred by impaired judgment or motor-
skills
, and the highest discrepancy
showed
by the highest
occupation
, the argument would be more convincing.