Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Write about the following topic: A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

: A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. with this opinion? eXj7
The worth of a person and how can we comprehend such an abstract notion, has been a long pondered upon subject. In times past, a person's worth may have been based upon the moral values one possesed, like how kind were they to their fellow people, how much kindness did they show to the genreal public or how trusted were they by their peers. However times have changed, and with it has changed how we as a society estimate a person's worth. These days all the attention seems to have been shifted to the materialistic possessions one gathers, rather than moral capacity one holds. One's worth is now connected to how high he/she is in the social ladder, the annual income of an individual, how big of a property do they own, etcetra. One can argue that moral values no longer hold importance over physical possions and currency. However one can also argue that people of the past who were revered as kings and lords, gained their very status because of their material wealth itself, and not because of the values they held. I beileve human behavour and society as a whole, is rarely black and white. There is always a hint of grey; it is true that a person's worth, on a surface level, is all too easy to be attributed to how much their annual salaray is or how expensive is the car they drive. But it does not invalidate the fact that, beyond that surface level evaluation, an immoral person will never be respected or loved by their own. Yes, they still may earn a huge paycheck, but physical possesions cannot the match the warmth and liveliness of human affection. To conclude, I do disagree with the statment, however not entirely. As today a person's value is connected to their net worth, but their place in the society is not a result of just that.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
worth
of a person and how can we comprehend such an abstract notion, has been a long pondered upon subject.

In times past, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
worth
may have
been based
upon the moral values one
Possible spelling mistake found.
possesed
, like how kind were they to their fellow
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
, how much kindness did they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
to the
Possible spelling mistake found.
genreal
public or how trusted were they
Did you maybe mean "buy"?
by
their peers.

Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
However
times have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changed
, and with it has
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changed
how we as a society estimate a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
worth
. These days all the attention seems to have
been shifted
to the materialistic possessions one gathers,
rather
than moral capacity one holds. One's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
worth
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
connected to how high he/she is in the social ladder, the annual income of an individual, how
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
of a property do they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
etcetra
.

One can argue that moral values no longer hold importance over physical
Possible spelling mistake found.
possions
and currency.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
However
one can
also
argue that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
of the past who
were revered
as kings and lords, gained their
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
status
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of their material wealth itself, and not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the values they held.

I
Possible spelling mistake found.
beileve
human
Possible spelling mistake found.
behavour
and society as a whole, is rarely black and white. There is always a hint of
Possible spelling mistake. 'grey' is British English.
grey
; it is true that a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
worth
, on a surface level, is all too easy to
be attributed
to how much their annual
Possible spelling mistake found.
salaray
is or how expensive is the car they drive.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
it does not invalidate the fact that, beyond that surface level evaluation, an immoral person will never
be respected
or
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
loved
by their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
. Yes, they
still
may earn a huge paycheck,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
physical
Possible spelling mistake found.
possesions
cannot the match the warmth and liveliness of human affection.
To conclude
,
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
I


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
do
disagree with the
Possible spelling mistake found.
statment
,
however
not
entirely
. As
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
value
is connected
to their net
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
worth
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
their place in the society is not a result of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
that.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay : A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. with this opinion?

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
318 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts