One of the widely discussed issues nowadays is overpopulation. The problem of overpopulation is really clumsy issue for current society because that’s problem can lead to adverse consequences in the near future. However there is no absolute agreement as some people think that government should provide new homes in cities, while others consider it in the contrysides.
One of the main positives of construction of houses in the contrisydes is that normally city are quite built up with various facilities, and so there are not enough place for building houses with huge territory in comparison with contrysides, whose territory is more available for building. In addiction air in the countrysides are always tin and fresh without harmful matters inside, in a contrast with the cities where air is so polluted. Turning to other side of the argument, contrysides are not so developed as city’s, they haven’t got powerful infrastructure, and enough number of schools, hospitals and shops for whole people who will be live on the residens.
The positive aspects of construction houses in the cities is that, cities have all prepared conditions for living. However one of the main issues is that big cities haven’t got enough space for arrangement and because of that government have to build high-rise building very close to each other and that type of edifice isn’t so convinient for residents. Also if government will construct houses in the city, over time because of clumsy amount of citizens, everyone will be cramped. What I mean here is that amount of residence will rise, while building for usage such as hospitals, schools, shops will not increase and then people just couldn’t fit in one city, because of state will not be able to provide and service all citizens and they have to move in the other area.
Having weighed everything mentioned up, we can come to a conclusion that Government should gradually expand cities features.
One of the
widely
discussed issues nowadays is overpopulation. The problem of overpopulation is
really
clumsy issue for
current
society
because
that’s problem can lead to adverse consequences in the near future.
However
there is no absolute agreement as
some
people
think
that
government
should provide new homes in
cities
, while others consider it in the
contrysides
.
One of the main positives of construction of
houses
in the
contrisydes
is that
normally
city are quite built up with various facilities, and
so
there are not
enough
place for
building
houses
with huge territory
in comparison
with
contrysides
, whose territory is more available for
building
. In addiction air in the countrysides are always tin and fresh without harmful matters inside, in a contrast with the
cities
where air is
so
polluted. Turning to
other
side of the argument,
contrysides
are not
so
developed as city’s, they haven’t
got
powerful infrastructure, and
enough
number of schools, hospitals and shops for whole
people
who will be
live
on the
residens
.
The
positive
aspects of construction
houses
in the
cities
is that,
cities
have all prepared conditions for living.
However
one of the main issues is that
big
cities
haven’t
got
enough
space for arrangement and
because
of that
government
have to
build high-rise
building
very
close to each
other
and that type of edifice isn’t
so
convinient
for residents.
Also
if
government
will construct
houses
in the city, over time
because
of clumsy amount of citizens, everyone will
be cramped
. What I mean here is that amount of residence will rise, while
building
for usage such as hospitals, schools, shops will not increase and then
people
just
couldn’t fit in one city,
because
of state will not be able to provide and service all
citizens and
they
have to
move
in the
other
area.
Having weighed everything mentioned up, we can
come
to a conclusion that
Government
should
gradually
expand
cities
features.