There have been ongoing debates whether human being should use animals for their
needs or not. There are spit opinions regarding this. Some believe that it is immoral and they
should be treated as equals; however, a few others claim that animals can be used for any
purpose. Therefore, before arriving on a decision, both views should be examined.
Discussing the first view, the foremost arguments the animal lovers put forward is
that the animals are as important as humans in nature. Though they are not superior to
humans, they form a vital clue in the food chain. So, they should neither be used nor be
disturbed. Besides this, to exploit animals in any manner is immoral unethical. Experts to
animal rights say that all the members in the living kingdom have equal rights to survive.
On the flip side, the supporters of the latter view favours exploitation of animals for
their needs and purposes. The most valid reason they give is that humans being the most
superior animals in nature, they get an unsaid right to use the lower animals. Apart from this,
it has been proved since ages that the relationship between the two is quite mutual. Rather
than harming, man has tactfully used animals for different purpose based on the animal’s
physical ability or its unique skill. To illustrate, dogs are used by the police for their sense of
smell, horses to travel, donkeys as least of burden and many more examples.
To conclude and give my opinion, I would certainly vote for the second opinion. The
reason is that although man exploits animals for his need, the relationship has not disturbed
the nature to a serious extent. However, care should be taken that this confidence should not
ignore the harm that can seriously decrease their numbers or damage them in any manner.
There have been ongoing debates whether human being should
use
animals
for their
needs
or not. There
are spit
opinions regarding this.
Some
believe that it is immoral and
they
should
be treated
as equals;
however
, a few others claim that
animals
can be
used
for any
purpose
.
Therefore
,
before
arriving on
a decision, both views should
be examined
.
Discussing the
first
view, the foremost arguments the
animal
lovers put forward is
that
the
animals
are as
important
as humans in nature. Though they are not superior
to
humans
, they form a vital clue in the food chain.
So
, they should neither be
used
nor be
disturbed
.
Besides
this, to exploit
animals
in any manner is immoral unethical. Experts
to
animal
rights say that all the members in the living kingdom have equal rights to survive.
On the flip side, the supporters of the latter view
favours
exploitation of
animals
for
their
needs and purposes. The most valid reason they give is that humans being the
most
superior
animals
in nature, they
get
an unsaid right to
use
the lower
animals
. Apart from this,
it has
been proved
since ages that the relationship between the two is quite mutual.
Rather
than
harming,
man
has
tactfully
used
animals
for
different
purpose based on the animal’s
physical
ability or its unique
skill
. To illustrate, dogs are
used
by the police for their sense
of
smell
, horses to travel, donkeys as least of burden and
many
more examples.
To conclude
and give my opinion, I would
certainly
vote for the second opinion. The
reason is that although
man
exploits
animals
for his need, the relationship has not disturbed
the
nature to a serious extent.
However
, care should
be taken
that this confidence should not
ignore
the harm that can
seriously
decrease their numbers or damage them in any manner.